DVRO Cannot Be Renewed for Period Less Than Five Years

A judge abused her discretion by renewing a stay-away order imposed on an ex-husband for a period of less than five years, Div. Two of the Court of Appeal for this district declared yesterday.

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

You just read:

DVRO Cannot Be Renewed for Period Less Than Five Years

Distribution channels:

EIN Presswire's priority is author transparency. We do our best to weed out false and misleading content. The content above is the sole responsibility of the author who makes it available. If you have any complaints, kindly contact the author above.