After a time, inadequate dependency reunification services don’t require an automatic extension for reasonable services
In Michael G. v. Superior Court, the Supreme Court today holds that parents who have had a child removed from their custody and have only inconsistently received reasonable services to help them reunify with the child are, after a specified period, not necessarily entitled to additional time for services before a juvenile court can end their parental rights.
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
