Proposition 22 ruling is not Dynamex 2.0, attorneys say
Five years ago, the California Supreme Court upended the definition of who could be considered an independent contractor under state labor law. Now another case with implications for so-called gig workers is making its way to the court, under very different circumstances. UC Berkeley School of Law professor Catherine Fisk said the case — Castellanos v. State of California — is not Dynamex 2.0. Meanwhile, four of the Supreme Court’s seven members have started since the Dynamex ruling, including Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero.
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.