There were 1,729 press releases posted in the last 24 hours and 402,046 in the last 365 days.

National Association of Social Workers & Women Have Options – Ohio File Federal Lawsuit Challenging Ohio Abortion Ban

Democracy Forward, ACLU of OH, NASW, WHO/O

These ordinances don't exist in a vacuum -- they are inextricably linked to and reinforce other threats to democratic institutions, and we will continue to hold those responsible accountable.”
— John Lewis, Senior Counsel, Democracy Forward

CINCINNATI, OHIO, UNITED STATES, May 11, 2022 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Today, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) and Women Have Options – Ohio (WHO/O), represented by the ACLU of Ohio and Democracy Forward, filed a federal complaint challenging an anti-abortion ordinance adopted by the Lebanon City Council on May 25, 2021. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. With the Supreme Court set to determine the fate of Roe v. Wade and after nearly fifty years of settled precedent with respect to the right to privacy, this lawsuit makes it clear that, regardless of that outcome, the Lebanon ordinance violates other constitutional protections–including due process and free speech.

Lebanon’s ordinance—one of more than 40 similar ordinances passed in localities around the country since 2019 and the only one enacted in Ohio—bans abortion and penalizes people who seek to assist those obtaining abortion care. Until now, these ordinances have been largely unchallenged in the courts.
Lebanon became the first city in Ohio to adopt this type of municipal abortion ban. Lebanon’s ordinance contains a potentially sweeping, yet undefined and vague, prohibition on any efforts to obtain or facilitate an abortion, even if the abortion takes place outside of the city limits. It further forbids “any person to knowingly aid or abet” a prohibited abortion, a proscription that includes things like “abortion doula services”–a term that is also left vague and undefined. It therefore deprives the public—including both pregnant persons and those who seek to provide them with assistance—of fair notice as to what conduct is prohibited.

Under the ordinance, ordinary citizens, like NASW members and WHO/O’s employees and volunteers, must interpret and apply complex, nuanced legal concepts in order to determine whether their conduct is likely to subject them to prosecution. The vague language included in the ordinance forces NASW and WHO/O to divert additional resources to ensure they can continue to provide services to their clients and members—reallocating staff time, spending money on things like procuring legal advice, and generally trying to protect themselves and their members. In doing so, the ordinance threatens to punish social workers for doing their jobs.

Living under ordinances like the one in Lebanon is just one example of the reality millions of Americans already face every day, even though the right to an abortion remains the law of the land. The courts are now the frontline of the battleground for democracy, not the last-resort protectors of it—and the stakes for challenging wrongdoing couldn’t be higher.

“In the wake of the recent news of the Supreme Court's leaked decision overturning Roe v. Wade, it's all the more important to continue to defend abortion access and ensure that municipalities cannot criminalize lawful activity through vague, sweeping bans. The ordinance’s vagueness, coupled with its potentially sweeping breadth, render it unlawful on multiple fronts,” noted Jessie Hill, cooperating attorney for the ACLU of Ohio.

“As the nation faces increasing threats to democracy at the state and local levels, these ordinances provide a chilling glimpse of a reality that extremists seek to impose on people and communities across the country, said John Lewis, senior counsel for Democracy Forward. “These ordinances don't exist in a vacuum -- they are inextricably linked to and reinforce other threats to democratic institutions, and we will continue to hold those responsible accountable.”

Full release with NASW and WHO/O quotes and complaint available here.

###

Democracy Forward Foundation (“Democracy Forward”) is a nonprofit legal organization founded in 2017 that litigates cases involving government action on behalf of organizations, individuals, and municipalities. The organization has taken 650 legal actions and achieved victories supporting democracy and improving the lives and wellbeing of people and communities. Democracy Forward Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

The ACLU of Ohio is a non-profit, non-partisan legal and advocacy organization working to expand civil liberties and civil rights for all people. It is a state affiliate of the ACLU Nationwide, with offices in all fifty states, plus Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico.

Case: 1:22-cv-00258-SJD Doc #: 1
(202) 601-2487

Emily Singer
Democracy Forward
esinger@democracyforward.org