EIN Presswire: Geothermal Power Live Feed Press Releases

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Commercial Operation of the Phase I Expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:16:40 +0000

RENO, NV --(Marketwire - January 09, 2012 ) - Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, today announced that the Phase I expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate is in commercial operation.

"The completion of the Phase I expansion and turning the unit over to the Nicaraguan national integrated electrical grid operator for commercial operation marks the completion of a major milestone in the continued development of our San Jacinto-Tizate project," said Shuman Moore , Chief Executive Officer of Ram Power . "This could not have been accomplished without the exceptional efforts and dedication of Ram Power's employees at the project site, in our Managua office, our corporate office staff in Reno , our board of directors and our Phase I project lenders."

Antony Mitchell , Executive Chairman of Ram Power , stated, "We would like to thank our Phase I lending consortium including the Central American Bank for Economic Integration ("CABEI"), Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij voor Ontwikkelingslanden N.V. ("FMO") and their affiliates for their continued support of this important project. We would also especially like to thank the Nicaraguan government and the Ministry of Energy and Mines , without whose support this expansion would not have been possible."

About Ram Power

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties. Ram Power has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: sscott@ram-power.com
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Mechanical Completion of Phase I Expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:16:00 +0000

RENO, NV -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 10/17/11 --
Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, is pleased to announce today that the Phase I 36 MW expansion at its geothermal power plant located at San Jacinto-Tizate, Nicaragua has reached mechanical completion.

Plant commissioning activities for the Phase I expansion have commenced and the unit is expected to be in commercial operation in December 2011 . The commissioning process includes the coordinated turnover of all plant subsystems systems between the Phase I expansion contractor Dymel and the commissioning staff, including Fuji Electric Corp. of America , the manufacturer of the turbine and generator. The Phase I expansion will add 36 MW of capacity to the existing 10 MW backpressure units currently in operation at San Jacinto. Once the Phase II 36 MW expansion is completed (which is expected to occur in December 2012 ), the 10 MW backpressure units will be decommissioned leaving 72 MW (net) operating capacity at San Jacinto.

"The mechanical completion of the Phase I expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate is a major milestone for Ram Power and our subsidiary, Polaris Energy Nicaragua, S.A. ," stated Shuman Moore , CEO of Ram Power . "The San Jacinto project has had significant challenges in its development, but through the hard work and determination of our employees in Nicaragua and the United States , we are now closer to our goal of producing clean geothermal power for the people of Nicaragua and value to our shareholders."

About Ram Power

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties. Ram Power has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: Email Contact
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power Announces Third Quarter 2011 Results

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:15:20 +0000

RENO, NV -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 11/14/11 --
Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company") a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, today reported its financial and operating results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2011 . This earnings release should be read in conjunction with Ram Power's MD&A and financial statements, which are available on the Company's website at www.ram-power.com and have been posted on SEDAR at www.sedar.com .

Concurrent with today's release, Shuman Moore , President and CEO of Ram Power , stated, " Ram Power has made significant progress over the quarter towards achieving our principal goal of having commercial operation of the 36 MW Phase I expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate by the end of December, 2011. The mechanical completion of the plant along with additional steam resource proven with our SJ 12-3 well create momentum as we begin to test systems on Phase I and continue work on the 36 MW Phase II expansion. Furthermore, the amendment of the terms associated with the Corporate Credit Facility, together with the expansion, allows the Company increased flexibility in the ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of projects. I am confident in our ability to continue to execute at San Jacinto and begin further development of our pipeline of projects."

OVERVIEW

The financial results of Ram Power for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below:

---------------------------- ----------------------------
For the three months ended For the nine months ended
(all figures in September 30 , September 30 , September 30 , September 30 ,
U.S dollars) 2011 2010 2011 2010
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------

Total revenue $ 1,253,362 $ 996,227 $ 3,320,408 $ 3,052,189
Direct cost of
energy
production 419,228 371,283 1,321,096 1,274,606
Expenses 4,032,596 5,183,707 9,614,741 13,782,347
Other loss 2,838,211 1,414,130 10,547,866 3,763,853
Gain on warrant
liability
valuation (11,233,341) - (8,722,221) -
Deferred taxes
and non-
controlling
interest 897,683 147,118 2,469,165 842,885
Net income/(loss) 6,094,351 (5,825,775) (6,971,909) (14,925,732)
Income/(loss) per
share $ 0.02 $ (0.04) $ (0.06) $ (0.10)

------------- -------------
As at As at
September 30, December 31,
2011 2010
------------- -------------
(As Restated)
Total assets $ 675,706,227 $ 478,232,551
Long-term debt 193,896,116 77,774,011
Total liabilities 271,439,705 123,741,344
Cash 96,670,097 29,517,574
Working capital 25,963,494 (8,475,675)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , the Company reported a net loss of approximately $7.9 million ( $0.06 per share). On a cash basis, for the same period, the Company had a negative cash flow of about $19.5 million from operating activities and spent approximately $148 million on additions to geothermal properties and other capital assets, including approximately $123 million on the Phase I and II San Jacinto-Tizate expansions and approximately $18 million on the Orita Project . At September 30, 2011 , the Company had free cash of approximately $96.7 million , of which $64 million is held for use in the San Jacinto Project .

OUTLOOK

Project Evaluation

Given the significant restructuring of the organization and the anticipated start-up in December 2011 of the Company's first power-producing expansion at the San Jacinto facility, management and the Board will be reevaluating each of the Company's projects and pre-exploration prospects to determine whether the Company will either aggressively develop or actively maintain the project based on various criteria including the availability of proven resources, costs of development, availability of financing, and other criteria as appropriate in order to determine the best use of the Company's existing and potential capital.

San Jacinto-Tizate

As previously disclosed, the Company has sufficient cash to complete the Phase I and II expansion of the San Jacinto Project as planned. Phase I is mechanically complete with all major construction activities finished. Plant commissioning activities for the Phase I expansion have commenced and the unit is expected to be in commercial operation in December 2011 . The December 2011 date is consistent with the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Nicaragua extension of the commercial operation date deadline for the Phase I expansion of the San Jacinto Exploitation Agreement to December 31, 2011 . A number of significant construction milestones have been completed for Phase II and this phase of the expansion is on schedule for completion in December 2012 .

Casita

The first slim hole at the Nicaraguan Casita project was drilled to a depth of 842 meters with a total loss of circulation and indicated temperature readings exceeding 230° Celsius (446° Fahrenheit). The temperature results obtained and the permeability found indicate that the location has a high probability of being a commercial resource. In the first quarter of 2012, pending confirmation from Sinclair Knight Merz , the company plans to commence drilling of the second slim hole at a location approximately 1.7 km from the first slim hole. The drilling of the slim holes and the interpretation of geo-scientific data is being carried out with the technical support of SKM.

Ram Power, Corp. will hold its earnings call to discuss the third quarter ending September 30, 2011 financial and operating results on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:00am EST ( 7:00am PST ). To listen to the call, please dial 1-888-789-9572 with participant pass code 7015044, or on the web at http://www.bellwebcasting.ca/audience/index.asp?eventid=94314210 .

About Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties and has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This news release contains certain "forward-looking information" which may include, but is not limited to, statements with respect to future events or future performance, management's expectations regarding the Company's growth, results of operations, estimated future revenues, requirements for additional capital, production costs and revenue, future demand for and prices of electricity, business prospects and opportunities. In addition, statements relating to estimates of recoverable geothermal energy "reserves" or "resources" or energy generation are forward-looking information, as they involve implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the geothermal resources and reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. Such forward-looking information reflects management's current beliefs and is based on information currently available to management. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "predicts", "intends", "targets", "aims", "anticipates" or "believes" or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases or may be identified by statements to the effect that certain actions "may", "could", "should", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved. A number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results or performance to materially differ from any future results or performance expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such factors include, among others, general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; the actual results of current geothermal energy production, development and/or exploration activities and the accuracy of probability simulations prepared to predict prospective geothermal resources; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; possible variations of production rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labor disputes and other risks of the geothermal industry; political instability or insurrection or war; labor force availability and turnover; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities or in the commencement of operations; as well as those factors discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Information Form. These factors should be considered carefully and readers of this news release should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Although the forward-looking information contained in this news release is based upon what management believes to be reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Such forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release and, other than as required by applicable securities laws, Ram Power assumes no obligation to update or revise such forward-looking information to reflect new events or circumstances.

Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: Email Contact
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Updates for the San Jacinto-Tizate Project

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:14:40 +0000

RENO, NV --(Marketwire - February 06, 2012 ) - Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, is pleased to announce the following updates for the San Jacinto-Tizate project in Nicaragua (the "Project").

Performance Test on Phase I Turbine

Under the steam turbine supply contract with Fuji Electric Corp. of America ("Fuji") for the Project's Phase I, 36 MW steam turbine generator, Fuji was required to conduct a performance test shortly after commercial operation of the geothermal power plant to determine if the steam turbine generator meets all its guaranteed performance requirements under the contract. The test was conducted in accordance with the standard test code for steam turbines as established by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) in order to verify that the turbine meets all its guaranteed performance requirements. The performance test was conducted on January 17, 2012 and the results confirmed that the Phase I steam turbine generator meets all guaranteed performance requirements under the contract.

San Jacinto Phase II Construction Update

The Company is continuing construction of the Phase II, 36 MW expansion at San Jacinto. Phase II construction is approximately 60% completed with final completion expected in December 2012 . Power plant critical component engineering is 100% complete and balance of plant engineering is 92% complete as of the end of December 2011 .

San Jacinto Phase II Credit Facility Disbursement

The Company received the second disbursement of $14 million under its $160 million Phase II credit facility on January 30, 2012 which will be used for Phase II construction costs. To date, the Company has drawn $118 million under this credit facility.

"With the successful commercial operation of our Phase I San Jacinto project, the successful performance test of the Fuji 36 MW steam turbine generator, and with the Phase II construction on schedule for completion by the end of this year, we are very pleased with the continued strong progress at our San Jacinto project," stated Shuman Moore , CEO of Ram Power .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: sscott@ram-power.com
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power, Corp. Announces San Jacinto Project, Casita Project and General Corporate Updates

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:14:00 +0000

RENO, NV -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 10/26/11 --
Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, announced today the following San Jacinto Project , Casita Project and Corporate updates.

SAN JACINTO PROJECT

Well SJ 12-3 at the San Jacinto Project was completed on August 23, 2011 to a depth of 7,841 ft. Well SJ 12-3 represents the Company's objective of drilling to confirm an eastwards extension of the San Jacinto Reservoir . After completion of the drilling, the well was flowed for 3 days to allow for stabilization. Following stabilization, the Company conducted a 10 day flow test under the supervision of Sinclair Knight Merz ("SKM"), the Company's resource consultant, which confirmed the well output of 30 tonnes per hour (t/h) of steam which equates to a power generation capacity of 3.9 MW (gross) at a design separation pressure of 5.1 barg. Following the flow test, the Company performed a pressure build-up test and determined that the well is connected to the main reservoir (constant pressure boundary) and is not isolated, therefore expanding the total volume of the confirmed San Jacinto resource. In addition, the well did exhibit some degree of impaired permeability possibly due to rock cuttings that may be removed through further stimulation which may result in improved well output.

CASITA PROJECT

As previously disclosed, the Company commenced in July of 2011 the drilling of the first of two slim holes designed to prove the commercial viability of the resource at the Casita concession. The first slim hole has been drilled to a depth of 842 meters with a total loss of circulation. A temperature survey conducted in the well has indicated temperature readings exceeding 230° Celsius (446° Fahrenheit). The temperature results obtained and the permeability found indicate that the location has a high probability of being a commercial resource. The company will commence in December the drilling of the second slim hole at a location approximately 1.7 km from the first slim hole.

CORPORATE RE-STRUCTURE

In September, the Company completed a reorganization of its personnel in the corporate office in Reno, Nevada . This reorganization resulted in the reduction of both expenses and staffing levels which will parallel the organization with the near term focus of completing the development of Phase I and II of the San Jacinto project. The reorganization is expected to save approximately $4 million a year in corporate G&A expense and will result in increased corporate cash flow.

"I am pleased with the results of our drilling program at both the San Jacinto project and the Casita concession," stated Shuman Moore , Chief Executive Officer of Ram Power . "We have also made great strides in reviewing the overall structure and composition of the Company, which will allow greater cash flow into the Company and will better suit the needs of our project base well into the future."

About Ram Power

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties. Ram Power has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: Email Contact
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Synchronization of the Phase I Expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:12:40 +0000

RENO, NV --(Marketwire - December 22, 2011 ) - Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, today announced that the Phase I expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate has been successfully synchronized to the Nicaraguan national integrated electrical grid. The Company expects commercial operation of the Phase I expansion to begin in the near future.

The Phase I expansion adds 36 MW of capacity to the existing 10 MW backpressure units currently in operation at San Jacinto. The electricity produced by the project is sold through a long-term power purchase agreement in place with Nicaraguan power distributors Disnorte-Dissur, subsidiaries of the Spanish utility Gas Natural Fenosa.

"Synchronization for the Phase I expansion at San Jacinto-Tizate is the result of a dedicated team of professionals who overcame all the challenges associated with building a world-class geothermal power project," stated Shuman Moore , CEO of Ram Power . "I am extremely proud of our employees who have continued to demonstrate their commitment to this project and to the development of geothermal power in the region."

"Congratulations to the team at Ram Power for their work on the Phase I expansion," said Antony Mitchell , Executive Chairman of Ram Power . "I would like to take this opportunity to thank our grid operator ENATREL and our customer Gas Natural Fenosa for their support in reaching synchronization. We look forward to a long and mutually beneficial relationship in helping to serve the power needs of Nicaragua . In addition, I would like to recognize the Company's management for leading our Nicaraguan and U.S. teams to accomplish this important goal, and look forward to their achieving commercial operation in the near future."

About Ram Power

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties. Ram Power has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: sscott@ram-power.com
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Selby F. Little as Acting Chief Financial Officer

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:12:00 +0000

RENO, NV -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 09/30/11 --
Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, announced today that John F. O'Neill has resigned as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to pursue other opportunities. The Company has appointed Selby F. "Bud" Little as Acting Chief Financial Officer replacing Mr. O'Neill.

Mr. Little was most recently Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CLP Resources, Inc. , a staffing company focused on construction and energy producing companies, and Chief Financial Officer of the Skilled Trades Group of CLP's parent company TrueBlue, Inc. , a multinational blue collar staffing company listed on the New York Stock Exchange . While at CLP and TrueBlue , Mr. Little completed four acquisitions and divestitures valued at $130 million , and developed and implemented Sarbanes-Oxley compliant financial and operational systems and controls. Mr. Little was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HydroChem Industrial Services, Inc. from 1996 to 2000, which provides industrial services to the petrochemical, pulp and paper, metals and electric power industries. While at HydroChem, Mr. Little raised $180 million in public and private capital, completed two acquisitions valued at $70 million , oversaw the design and construction of a 130,000 square foot, 20 acre laboratory, manufacturing and headquarters facility, and developed and implemented multinational financial and operational systems and controls. Earlier in his career, Mr. Little was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ross Systems, Inc. and Unify Corporation .

Mr. Little received his BS in Economics from Texas A&M University and MBA in Finance from the Texas A&M Mays Business School . He is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas , and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants , the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants and Financial Executives International .

"On behalf of the Company's Board of Directors, we would like to thank John for his service to the Company during a challenging period," stated Antony Mitchell , Executive Chairman of Ram Power . "Bud's background with capital markets, corporate financial processes and strategic planning make him uniquely well-suited to contribute significantly to the Company's continued success at San Jacinto and beyond."

About Ram Power

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties. Ram Power has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: Email Contact
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power Announces Release Date for Third Quarter 2011 Results

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:11:20 +0000

RENO, NV -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 11/11/11 --
Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power") today announced that it will release its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 on November 14, 2011 . Management will discuss third quarter ended financial results and other matters during a conference call and live audio webcast on Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:00am EST ( 7:00am PST ).

The live audio call will be accessible at 888-789-9572 by entering the participant pass code 7015044.

The live audio webcast will be accessible at http://www.bellwebcasting.ca/audience/index.asp?eventid=94314210

An archived version of the webcast will be available for three months following the call. To listen to a recording of the call by telephone, call 800-408-3053. Use the conference call access code 4511255. The audio instant replay will be available until December 16, 2011 .

About Ram Power, Corp.

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties and has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statement

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power , undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third-parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: Email Contact
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

RAM POWER, CORP. ANNOUNCES MECHANICAL COMPLETION OF PHASE I EXPANSION AT SAN JACINTO-TIZATE

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:10:40 +0000

HASH(0x9dd1bd0)

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Execution of Amendments to Credit Facility

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:10:00 +0000

RENO, NV --(Marketwire - December 06, 2011 ) - Ram Power, Corp. (TSX: RPG) ("Ram Power" or the "Company"), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, announced today the execution of the amendments to its $50 million , term loan credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with Sprott Resource Lending Partnership , Exploration Capital Partners 2008 Limited Partnership and Newberry International Holdings Ltd. (collectively, the "Lenders").

The amendments extend the maturity date of the Credit Facility from February 28, 2012 to September 30, 2013 , waive the non-compliance related to the delivery of post-closing collateral items by deadlines specified in the original agreement, and waive the non-compliance of Ram Power of its repayment obligation to the extent that equity distributions are made available to the Company from the proceeds of the San Jacinto phase II credit facility. In connection with the amendments, the Lenders agreed to cancel 18,031,251 common share purchase warrants associated with the Credit Facility.

"We are pleased with the execution of the credit facility amendments," stated Shuman Moore , CEO of Ram Power . "The Lenders have continued to show commitment to the Company during challenging times, and we are thankful for their continued support and look forward to the commercial operation date for the Phase I expansion in San Jacinto at the end of the month."

About Ram Power

Ram Power is a renewable energy company based in Reno, Nevada , engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and operating geothermal properties. Ram Power has an interest in geothermal projects, primarily in the United States , Canada , and Latin America .

Cautionary Statements

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws including information regarding the business of Ram Power . Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by this information. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release. Ram Power undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information, other than as required by law, or comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third parties in respect of Ram Power , or its financial or operating results or its securities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Steven Scott
Director of Investor Relations
Ram Power, Corp.
Phone: 775-398-3711
Email: sscott@ram-power.com
www.ram-power.com

Source: Ram Power, Corp.

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:57:55 +0000

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, Feb. 7, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0769027/Concentrating-Solar-Power-CSP.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Renewable_energy

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) slipped from an all-time high in production of 885 GWh in 2008 to 862 GWh in 2009. New capacity becoming operational in 2010 pushed production to 1121 GWh and an estimated 1475 GWh in 2011. The wholesale value from this technology, also known as Solar Thermal power, generated $68 USD million in 2008, $102 million in 2009, to $362 million in 2010. 2011 sales should top a half billion dollars at an estimated $545 million.

The cost of the installed base of CSP at the end of 2011 is estimated at $9.5 billion. Of that roughly 93% of the installed base value is in parabolic trough technology. By 2015, that percentage is forecast to drop to 70% as power tower, also called central receiving station technology, becomes more common. The other two CSP technologies, linear Fresnel reflector and the Stirling engine/dish design are decidedly lacking although there are a few small projects going forward.

The seemingly smooth upward curve of CSP productions hides some facts that will impinge future growth. At least 2,250 MW of planned CSP capacity was suddenly switched to PV due to the lower installation costs of PV, among other reasons. Also hidden by the high Spanish feed-in tariff is the somewhat low capacity of the plants in Spain due to less than ideal solar resources. Due to the global debt crisis, Spain had considered cutting its artificially high feed-in tariff, but to preserve investor confidence, has chosen to delay bringing some plants online and limiting the output of others.

Thermal energy storage (TES) became a big topic in 2011 with demonstrations of 24 hour generation at a plant in Spain less than four months after startup. Seven to eight hours' storage appears to be the norm for parabolic trough plants at a cost of roughly an additional 10-11 % of the plant cost but can yield capacity factors over 50%, a key to profitability. Power towers operating at higher temperatures can achieve 10- 15 hours storage at a slightly less cost penalty.

New development and construction activities will intensify in 2012 in Australia, India, and China. China has licensed technology from eSolar and plans to build 2 GW of combined CSP/biomass plants in the next decade. India too has created a 20 GW by 2020 solar wish list. Australia continues to study the technology and is building a world study center of power tower technology.

As 2011 ends, the global capacity of utility-scale CSP will be right at 2 GW with approximately another 2500 to 3500 MW to be operational in 2012, depending on several factors. While some forecasters believe the US concentrating solar power capacity alone will reach 6 GW by 2015, SBI Energy analysis points to factors that suggest an installation rate that while consistent with the opportunities CSP represents, is more indicative of the current global economic and political realities. These factors include the events known as the Islamic Spring, the overall lingering economic doldrums, and current photovoltaic pricing wars as well as utility concerns regarding implementation of renewables on a large scale. While these concerns are not permanent, they will retard implementation of CSP for a few years.

CSP Energy tends to be CSP installation has been directly linked to government interest in the technology. CSP Global Markets provides insight into the current and future utility scale electrical generation CSP markets at both the plant and component level, with particular attention to the solar field elements which represent over 50% of the plant's cost. For every major component, global market size is provided and forecast through 2020 based on the SBI Energy's evaluation of the factors affecting the market growth as a whole.

Chapter 1 Executive Summary

Chapter 2 Background to CSP Markets

Scope and Methodology of Report

Market Definition and History

General CSP Process Description for electricity generation

Figure 2-1 CSP process schematic

Market Categories

Parabolic troughs

Figure 2-2 Parabolic trough design

Figure 2-3 Parabolic trough mirror/receiver detail

Power Towers

Figure 2-4 Power tower design

Figure 2-5 Power tower mirror/receiver detail

Dish/Engine Systems

Figure 2-6 Dish/Engine design

Figure 2-7 Dish/engine concentration system detail

Linear Fresnel Reflectors

Figure 2-8 Fresnel lens optics

Figure 2-9 Linear Fresnel reflector detail

Thermal Storage

Figure 2-10 Thermal storage schematic detail

Hybrid Plants

Figure 2-11 Hybrid Plant Schematic

Figure 2-12 Hybrid plant power source by hour of the day

Concentrating Solar for Heat Generation

Industrial uses of solar heat

Figure 2-13 CSP -Solar Heat schematic

Figure 2-14 CSP -Global Industrial use

Residential uses of solar heat

Figure 2-15 CSP -US Residential installations

Comparison of Market Categories

Table 2-1 Features of CSP Categories

Table 2-2 Power Generation efficiency by CSP category

CSP Market Factors

Climatic Factors

Table 2-3 Climatic factors vs. Solar Energy Process

Figure 2-16 Geographic distribution of climatic factors

Power Distribution Factors

Table 2-4 Comparison of HVAC vs. HVDC

Table 2-5 Power generation factors vs. distance to market

Figure 2-17 Contribution to power grid by CSP category

Cooling Process Factors

Table 2-6 Cooling Options

Figure 2-18 Water cooling schematic

Figure 2-19 Dry cooling schematic

The Renewable Power Industry

Value of Electricity from Renewable Sources

Public policies affect on Renewable Power Generation

Policies to Promote Renewable Energy Sources

Production Tax Credits

Renewable Portfolio Standards

Renewable Power Direct Marketing

Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

Fossil Fuel Emissions Caps

Table 2-7 Pros and Cons of public policy use to promote renewable energy generation

Table 2-8 International public policies

Research investments in Renewable Energy

Table 2-9 US government investment in Renewable Energy through 2010

Table 2-10 Global public investment in Renewable Energy through 2010

Research Efforts in Solar Power

Table 2-11 US government investment in Solar Power through 2010

Table 2-12 US government investment in Solar Power currently allocated

Table 2-13 Global public investment in Solar Power through 2010

Table 2-14 Global public investment in Solar Power currently allocated

Figure 2-20 Public Investments vs. Solar power delivered though 2010

Figure 2-21 Public Investments vs. Solar power projected 2011- 2020

Research Efforts in CSP

Table 2-15 US government investment in CSP Technologies through 2010

Table 2-16 US government investment in CSP Technologies currently allocated

Table 2-17 Global public investment in CSP Technologies through 2010

Table 2-18 Global public investment in CSP Technologies currently allocated

Figure 2-22 Public Investments vs. CSP power delivered though 2010

Figure 2-23 Public Investments vs. CSP power projected 2011- 2020

Renewable Energy Market Size and Growth

Basis of Forecasts

Figure 2-24 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-25 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-26 US ROI on PV Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-27 US PV Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-28 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-29 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-30 Global PV Market 2012-2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Geothermal power

Figure 2-31 US Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-32 US Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-33 US ROI on Geothermal power Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-34 US Geothermal power Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-35 Global Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-36 Global Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-37 Global Geothermal power Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Biopower

Figure 2-38 US Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-39 US Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-40 US ROI on Biopower Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-41 US Biopower Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-42 Global Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-43 Global Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-44 Global Biopower Market 2012, 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Photovoltaics

Figure 2-45 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-46 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-47 US ROI on PV Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-48 US PV Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-49 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-50 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-51 Global PV Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Concentrating Solar Power

Figure 2-52 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-53 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output

Figure 2-54 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-55 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-56 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Figure 2-57 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-58 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-59 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-60 Global CSP Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-61 Global CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Concentrating Solar Process Heat

Figure 2-62 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Installations and Capacity

Figure 2-63 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Power Savings

Figure 2-64 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-65 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-66 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Figure 2-67 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Planned installations and capacity

Figure 2-68 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Planned Power Savings

Figure 2-69 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-70 Global CSP Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-71 Global CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Chapter 3 Regional and National Markets

CSP Global Market Initiative (CSP- GMI)

Table 3-1 Goals of the CSP-GMI

Figure 3-1 CSP-GMI Regions

Middle East --North Africa (MENA)

MENA Regional issues

Desertec Industrial Initiative

Dii GmbH

Table 3-2 Desertec Supporting Organizations

Figure 3-2 Desertec claims regarding CSP potential

Figure 3-3 Desertec vision of MENA power generation and distribution

Figure 3-4 MENA Regions suitable for CSP vs. implementation issues

Figure 3-5 MENA Regions suitable for CSP vs. market demand

Southwest United States-Mexico (USMEX)

USMEX Regional issues

Figure 3-6 USMEX Regions suitable for CSP vs. implementation issues

USMEX Regional markets

Figure 3-7 USMEX Regions suitable for CSP vs. market demand

Southern Europe (SoEur)

SoEur Regional issues

Figure 3-8 SoEur Regions suitable for CSP vs. implementation issues

SoEur Regional markets

Figure 3-9 SoEur Regions suitable for CSP vs. market demand

National Markets

Algeria

Algerian development activities to date

Table 3-3 Algerian development efforts through 2011

Algerian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-4 Algerian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Algerian-specific issues

Algerian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-10 Algerian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Australia

Australian development activities to date

Table 3-5 Australian development efforts through 2011

Australian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-6 Australian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Australian-specific issues

Australian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-11 Australian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Brazil

Brazilian development activities to date

Table 3-7 Brazilian development efforts through 2011

Brazilian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-8 Brazilian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Brazilian-specific issues

Brazilian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-12 Brazilian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-13 Chilean CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

China

Chinese development activities to date

Table 3-9 Chinese development efforts through 2011

Chinese installed and planned capacities

Table 3-10 Chinese installed and planned capacities through 2011

Chinese-specific issues

Chinese CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-14 Chinese CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Egypt

Egyptian development activities to date

Table 3-11 Egyptian development efforts through 2011

Egyptian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-12 Egyptian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Egyptian-specific issues

Egyptian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-15 Egyptian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Greece

Grecian development activities to date

Table 3-13 Grecian development efforts through 2011

Grecian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-14 Grecian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Grecian-specific issues

Grecian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-16 Grecian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

India

Indian development activities to date

Table 3-15 Indian development efforts through 2011

Indian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-16 Indian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Indian-specific issues

Indian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-17 Indian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Iran

Iranian development activities to date

Table 3-17 Iranian development efforts through 2011

Iranian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-18 Iranian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Iranian-specific issues

Iranian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-18 Iranian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Israel

Israeli development activities to date

Table 3-19 Israeli development efforts through 2011

Israeli installed and planned capacities

Table 3-20 Israeli installed and planned capacities through 2011

Israeli-specific issues

Israeli CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-19 Israeli CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Italy

Italian development activities to date

Table 3-21 Italian development efforts through 2011

Italian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-22 Italian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Italian-specific issues

Italian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-20 Italian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Jordan

Jordanian development activities to date

Table 3-23 Jordanian development efforts through 2011

Jordanian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-24 Jordanian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Jordanian-specific issues

Jordanian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-21 Jordanian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Mexico

Mexican development activities to date

Table 3-25 Mexican development efforts through 2011

Mexican installed and planned capacities

Table 3-26 Mexican installed and planned capacities through 2011

Mexican-specific issues

Mexican CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-22 Mexican CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Morocco

Moroccan development activities to date

Table 3-27 Moroccan development efforts through 2011

Moroccan installed and planned capacities

Table 3-28 Moroccan installed and planned capacities through 2011

Moroccan-specific issues

Moroccan CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-23 Moroccan CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

South Africa

South African development activities to date

Table 3-29 South African development efforts through 2011

South African installed and planned capacities

Table 3-30 South African installed and planned capacities through 2011

South African-specific issues

South African CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-24 South African CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Spain

Spanish development activities to date

Table 3-31 Spanish development efforts through 2011

Spanish installed and planned capacities

Table 3-32 Spanish installed and planned capacities through 2011

Spanish-specific issues

Spanish CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-25 Spanish CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

United States

US development activities to date

Table 3-33 US development efforts through 2011

US installed and planned capacities

Table 3-34 US installed and planned capacities through 2011

US-specific issues

US CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-26 US CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

African Nation's Activities

Other African national development activities to date

Table 3-35 Other African national development efforts through 2011

Other African nation's installed and planned capacities

Table 3-36 Other African nation's installed and planned capacities through 2011

Other-African national specific issues

Other National Activities

Other national development activities to date

Table 3-37 Other national development efforts through 2011

Other nation's installed and planned capacities

Table 3-38 Other nation's installed and planned capacities through 2011

Other national specific issues

Chapter 4 CSP Components: Description, Use, and Markets

Basis of Forecasts

Figure 4-1 Components as a percentage of plant costs

Engineering, Construction, and Procurement Companies

Table 4-1 ECP firms for installed and planned CSP facilities

Figure 4-2 Market share by EPC firm

High Tech Components

Mirrors, Frames and Cleaning Systems

Desired properties of CSP mirrors

Mirrors: Glass, plastic film. or polished metal

Table 4-2 Feature comparison between mirror materials

Research in material choice

Table 4-3 Global research in mirror materials

Table 4-4 Research in CSP mirrors

Installed and planned installations of mirrors

Table 4-5 Installed mirrors by material options

Table 4-6 Planned installations of mirrors by material options

Mirrors Producers

Table 4-7 Global mirror manufacturers, installed and planned

Mirror Market and Forecasts

Figure 4-3 US and Global CSP Mirror Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-4 US and Global CSP Mirror Market: 2012 - 2016

Figure 4-5 US and Global CSP Mirror Market: 2016 - 2020

Frame systems

Table 4-8 Global CSP Frames manufacturers, installed and planned

Figure 4-6 US and Global CSP Frames Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-7 US and Global CSP Frames Market: 2012 - 2016

Cleaning Systems

Table 4-9 Cleaning system manufacturers, installed and planned

Figure 4-8 US and Global CSP Cleaning System Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-9 US and Global CSP Cleaning System Market: 2012 - 2016

Receivers and Heat Flow Systems

Receiver, receiver support and interconnections

Desirable properties in receivers

Table 4-10 Feature comparison between Receiver designs

Research in Receiver Design

Table 4-11 Research in receiver design and materials

Installed and planned installations of mirrors

Table 4-12 Installed receivers by design

Table 4-13 Planned installations of receivers by design

Current Receiver Producers

Table 4-14 Manufacturers of receiver components

Receiver Market and Forecasts

Figure 4-10 US and Global CSP Receiver Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-11 US and Global CSP Receiver Market: 2012 - 2016

Collection, piping, valves and traps

Issues unique to CSP

Operating temperature range

Environmental conditions

Length of service

Longevity of service

Accessibility for preventative maintenance and performance issues

Table 4-15 Collection and piping issues unique to CSP

Companies with installed piping systems and experience

Table 4-16 Companies with installed piping systems and experience

Collection as a function of plant parameters

Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF)

Desirable properties in HTF

Table 4-17 Feature comparison between HTF systems

Research in heat transfer fluids

Table 4-18 Research in heat transfer fluids

Installed and planned installations of HTF

Table 4-19 Heat transfer fluids in installed CSP plants

Table 4-20 Heat transfer fluids selected for planned CSP plants

HTF Market and Forecast

Figure 4-12 US and Global CSP HTF Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-13 US and Global CSP HTF Market: 2012 - 2016

Established Components

Steam Generation Plant

Table 4-21 Unique CSP Steam Plant Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-14 US and Global CSP Steam Plant Installations

Figure 4-15 US and Global CSP Steam Plant Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Cooling

Table 4-22 Unique CSP Cooling Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-16 US and Global CSP Cooling Installations

Figure 4-17 US and Global CSP Cooling Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Thermal Storage by Molten Salts

Table 4-23 Unique CSP Thermal Storage Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-18 US and Global CSP Thermal Storage Installations

Figure 4-19 US and Global CSP Thermal Storage Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Sun Tracking Systems

Table 4-24 Unique CSP Sun Tracking Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-20 US and Global CSP Sun Tracking Installations

Figure 4-21 US and Global CSP Sun Tracking Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Materials of Construction

Figure 4-22 Percentage of cost of CSP installations by material of construction

Significant issues concerning materials of construction: availability, cost

Steel

Table 4-25 Steel usage in CSP

Figure 4-23 US and Global steel market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Copper

Table 4-26 Copper usage in CSP

Figure 4-24 US and Global copper market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Brass

Table 4-27 Brass usage in CSP

Figure 4-25 US and Global brass market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Aluminum

Table 4-28 Aluminum usage in CSP

Figure 4-26 US and Global aluminum market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Concrete

Table 4-29 Concrete usage in CSP

Figure 4-27 US and Global concrete market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Molten Salts

Table 4-30 Molten salts usage in CSP

Figure 4-28 US and Global molten salts market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Silica

Table 4-31 Silica usage in CSP

Figure 4-29 US and Global silica market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Chapter 5 Market Promotion, Distribution, and Trends

Promotion of CSP Market

General environmental movement

Figure 5-1 Growth in public demand for renewable energy sourcing

Desire for energy independence

Table 5-1 History of energy independence efforts in the US

Fear of lack of access to oil

Table 5-2 Relationship between the "Islamic Spring" uprisings, oil resources, and CSP investments

Fear of nuclear power

Table 5-3 Shifts in perception of nuclear power after 2010 Japanese tsunami

Electrical Distribution by Region

Figure 5-2 Schematic of generic electric grid

North America

US electric grid

Table 5-4 Role of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC),

Figure 5-3 Major distribution lines of continental US electric grid

Electricity generation in Hawaii and Alaska

Figure 5-4 Major distribution lines of Hawaiian and Alaskan electric grids

Table 5-5 Role of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC),

Table 5-6 Upgrades to US electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Canadian electric grid

Figure 5-5 Major distribution lines of Canadian electric grid

Mexican and Central American electric grid

Table 5-7 Status of Mexican and Central American electric grids

Figure 5-6 Major distribution lines within Central America

Table 5-8 Upgrades to Central American electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

South America

Table 5-9 Status of South America's electric grid

Figure 5-7 Major distribution lines within South America

Table 5-10 Upgrades to South American electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Europe and Russia

Electrical Distribution within Europe

Table 5-11 Status of European electric grid

Figure 5-8 Major distribution lines within Europe

Table 5-12 Upgrades to European electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Electrical Distribution within Russia

Table 5-13 Status of Russian electric grid

Figure 5-9 Major distribution lines within Russia

Table 5-14 Upgrades to Russian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Asia, India, and China

Electrical Distribution within Asia

Table 5-15 Status of Asia's electric grids

Figure 5-10 Major distribution lines within Asia

Table 5-16 Upgrades to Asian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Electrical Distribution within India

Table 5-17 Status of India's electric grids

Figure 5-11 Major distribution lines within India

Table 5-18 Upgrades to Indian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Electrical Distribution within China

Table 5-19 Status of China's electric grids

Figure 5-12 Major distribution lines within China

Table 5-20 Upgrades to Chinese electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Australia

Electrical Distribution within Australia

Table 5-21 Status of Australia's electric grids

Figure 5-13 Major distribution lines within Australia

Table 5-22 Upgrades to Australian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Africa

Electrical Distribution within Africa

Table 5-23 Status of Africa's electric grids

Figure 5-14 Major distribution lines within Africa

Table 5-24 Upgrades to African electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

CSP Market Trends

Investment Climate

Figure 5-15 Investments over time and world events

Public opinion

Figure 5-16 Public demand for solar energy

Proliferation of demonstration plants

Table 5-25 Recent demonstration plants

Ease of entry compared to other renewable energies

Table 5-26 New construction costs as a function of location and energy source

Continued need for premium pricing

Figure 5-17 Relative declines in power generation by energy type

Chapter 6 Competitive Profiles [selected from list]

Abengoa USA/ Abengoa Spain

ACCIONA Solar Power/ACCIONA Energia

Alanod

Albiasa Solar

Ausra

Beacon Solar

Boeing

Bright Source Energy

Carrizo Energy

Cristaleria Espanola

Dow chemical

DuPont

Ener-T Global

Epuron

Eskom

E-solar

EuroTrough

Flabeg

Florida Power and Light

Grupo Enhol

HelioDynamics

Industrial Solar Technology Corp

Inland Energy

Naugatuck Glass

Paneltec Corp

Pilkington

Radco Industries

ReflecTech

Samca

SCHOTT Solar

Sener Group

Siemens

Sinoy Mirror

Sky Fuel

SoquiMich

Solar Millennium AG

Solar Power Group

Solel Solar Systems

Solargenix Energy

Sopogy

Stirling Energy Systems

Chapter 7 End Users

Public End Users

Utility Companies

Table 7-1 US Utilities operating CSP

Public perception of renewable energy

Figure 7-1 Changes in public perception over time

Perception of CSP vs. other renewable energy sources

Trends in public perception

Public willingness to pay premium pricing for renewable energy

Figure 7-2 Distribution of premium price options and acceptance

Industrial End Users

Uses by industry

Table 7-2 CSP Industrial Applications

Motivation factors for industrial users

Table 7-3 Leading motivators for industrial CSP use

Implementation Trends of industrial users

Table 7-4 Implementation Trends of Industrial CSP Applications

Appendices

List of Abbreviations

Selected marketers contact information

Selected Organizations, Research Institutes, and Universities- contact information

Installed and Planned CSP Facilities

Selected CSP Facilities: Profiles and contact information

To order this report:Renewable energy Industry: Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

Market Research Report

Check our

Industry Analysis and Insights

CONTACT
Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: nbo@reportlinker.com
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626

SOURCE Reportlinker

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:14:06 +0000

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, Feb. 6, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0769027/Concentrating-Solar-Power-CSP.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Renewable_energy

Chapter 1 Executive Summary

Chapter 2 Background to CSP Markets

Scope and Methodology of Report

Market Definition and History

General CSP Process Description for electricity generation

Figure 2-1 CSP process schematic

Market Categories

Parabolic troughs

Figure 2-2 Parabolic trough design

Figure 2-3 Parabolic trough mirror/receiver detail

Power Towers

Figure 2-4 Power tower design

Figure 2-5 Power tower mirror/receiver detail

Dish/Engine Systems

Figure 2-6 Dish/Engine design

Figure 2-7 Dish/engine concentration system detail

Linear Fresnel Reflectors

Figure 2-8 Fresnel lens optics

Figure 2-9 Linear Fresnel reflector detail

Thermal Storage

Figure 2-10 Thermal storage schematic detail

Hybrid Plants

Figure 2-11 Hybrid Plant Schematic

Figure 2-12 Hybrid plant power source by hour of the day

Concentrating Solar for Heat Generation

Industrial uses of solar heat

Figure 2-13 CSP -Solar Heat schematic

Figure 2-14 CSP -Global Industrial use

Residential uses of solar heat

Figure 2-15 CSP -US Residential installations

Comparison of Market Categories

Table 2-1 Features of CSP Categories

Table 2-2 Power Generation efficiency by CSP category

CSP Market Factors

Climatic Factors

Table 2-3 Climatic factors vs. Solar Energy Process

Figure 2-16 Geographic distribution of climatic factors

Power Distribution Factors

Table 2-4 Comparison of HVAC vs. HVDC

Table 2-5 Power generation factors vs. distance to market

Figure 2-17 Contribution to power grid by CSP category

Cooling Process Factors

Table 2-6 Cooling Options

Figure 2-18 Water cooling schematic

Figure 2-19 Dry cooling schematic

The Renewable Power Industry

Value of Electricity from Renewable Sources

Public policies affect on Renewable Power Generation

Policies to Promote Renewable Energy Sources

Production Tax Credits

Renewable Portfolio Standards

Renewable Power Direct Marketing

Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

Fossil Fuel Emissions Caps

Table 2-7 Pros and Cons of public policy use to promote renewable energy generation

Table 2-8 International public policies

Research investments in Renewable Energy

Table 2-9 US government investment in Renewable Energy through 2010

Table 2-10 Global public investment in Renewable Energy through 2010

Research Efforts in Solar Power

Table 2-11 US government investment in Solar Power through 2010

Table 2-12 US government investment in Solar Power currently allocated

Table 2-13 Global public investment in Solar Power through 2010

Table 2-14 Global public investment in Solar Power currently allocated

Figure 2-20 Public Investments vs. Solar power delivered though 2010

Figure 2-21 Public Investments vs. Solar power projected 2011- 2020

Research Efforts in CSP

Table 2-15 US government investment in CSP Technologies through 2010

Table 2-16 US government investment in CSP Technologies currently allocated

Table 2-17 Global public investment in CSP Technologies through 2010

Table 2-18 Global public investment in CSP Technologies currently allocated

Figure 2-22 Public Investments vs. CSP power delivered though 2010

Figure 2-23 Public Investments vs. CSP power projected 2011- 2020

Renewable Energy Market Size and Growth

Basis of Forecasts

Figure 2-24 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-25 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-26 US ROI on PV Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-27 US PV Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-28 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-29 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-30 Global PV Market 2012-2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Geothermal power

Figure 2-31 US Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-32 US Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-33 US ROI on Geothermal power Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-34 US Geothermal power Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-35 Global Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-36 Global Geothermal power Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-37 Global Geothermal power Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Biopower

Figure 2-38 US Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-39 US Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-40 US ROI on Biopower Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-41 US Biopower Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-42 Global Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-43 Global Biopower Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-44 Global Biopower Market 2012, 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Photovoltaics

Figure 2-45 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-46 US PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-47 US ROI on PV Investments 2007 - 2011

Figure 2-48 US PV Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-49 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-50 Global PV Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-51 Global PV Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Concentrating Solar Power

Figure 2-52 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-53 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output

Figure 2-54 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-55 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-56 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Figure 2-57 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Nameplate MW Installed

Figure 2-58 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Power Output, MW

Figure 2-59 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-60 Global CSP Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-61 Global CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Concentrating Solar Process Heat

Figure 2-62 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Installations and Capacity

Figure 2-63 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Power Savings

Figure 2-64 US CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-65 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-66 US CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Figure 2-67 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Planned installations and capacity

Figure 2-68 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Planned Power Savings

Figure 2-69 Global CSP Market 2007 - 2011, Cost per Unit Installed

Figure 2-70 Global CSP Market 2012 - 2016, Nameplate MW Planned

Figure 2-71 Global CSP Market 2012, 2016, Cost per Unit Planned

Chapter 3 Regional and National Markets

CSP Global Market Initiative (CSP- GMI)

Table 3-1 Goals of the CSP-GMI

Figure 3-1 CSP-GMI Regions

Middle East --North Africa (MENA)

MENA Regional issues

Desertec Industrial Initiative

Dii GmbH

Table 3-2 Desertec Supporting Organizations

Figure 3-2 Desertec claims regarding CSP potential

Figure 3-3 Desertec vision of MENA power generation and distribution

Figure 3-4 MENA Regions suitable for CSP vs. implementation issues

Figure 3-5 MENA Regions suitable for CSP vs. market demand

Southwest United States-Mexico (USMEX)

USMEX Regional issues

Figure 3-6 USMEX Regions suitable for CSP vs. implementation issues

USMEX Regional markets

Figure 3-7 USMEX Regions suitable for CSP vs. market demand

Southern Europe (SoEur)

SoEur Regional issues

Figure 3-8 SoEur Regions suitable for CSP vs. implementation issues

SoEur Regional markets

Figure 3-9 SoEur Regions suitable for CSP vs. market demand

National Markets

Algeria

Algerian development activities to date

Table 3-3 Algerian development efforts through 2011

Algerian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-4 Algerian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Algerian-specific issues

Algerian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-10 Algerian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Australia

Australian development activities to date

Table 3-5 Australian development efforts through 2011

Australian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-6 Australian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Australian-specific issues

Australian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-11 Australian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Brazil

Brazilian development activities to date

Table 3-7 Brazilian development efforts through 2011

Brazilian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-8 Brazilian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Brazilian-specific issues

Brazilian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-12 Brazilian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-13 Chilean CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

China

Chinese development activities to date

Table 3-9 Chinese development efforts through 2011

Chinese installed and planned capacities

Table 3-10 Chinese installed and planned capacities through 2011

Chinese-specific issues

Chinese CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-14 Chinese CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Egypt

Egyptian development activities to date

Table 3-11 Egyptian development efforts through 2011

Egyptian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-12 Egyptian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Egyptian-specific issues

Egyptian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-15 Egyptian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Greece

Grecian development activities to date

Table 3-13 Grecian development efforts through 2011

Grecian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-14 Grecian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Grecian-specific issues

Grecian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-16 Grecian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

India

Indian development activities to date

Table 3-15 Indian development efforts through 2011

Indian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-16 Indian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Indian-specific issues

Indian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-17 Indian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Iran

Iranian development activities to date

Table 3-17 Iranian development efforts through 2011

Iranian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-18 Iranian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Iranian-specific issues

Iranian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-18 Iranian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Israel

Israeli development activities to date

Table 3-19 Israeli development efforts through 2011

Israeli installed and planned capacities

Table 3-20 Israeli installed and planned capacities through 2011

Israeli-specific issues

Israeli CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-19 Israeli CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Italy

Italian development activities to date

Table 3-21 Italian development efforts through 2011

Italian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-22 Italian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Italian-specific issues

Italian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-20 Italian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Jordan

Jordanian development activities to date

Table 3-23 Jordanian development efforts through 2011

Jordanian installed and planned capacities

Table 3-24 Jordanian installed and planned capacities through 2011

Jordanian-specific issues

Jordanian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-21 Jordanian CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Mexico

Mexican development activities to date

Table 3-25 Mexican development efforts through 2011

Mexican installed and planned capacities

Table 3-26 Mexican installed and planned capacities through 2011

Mexican-specific issues

Mexican CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-22 Mexican CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Morocco

Moroccan development activities to date

Table 3-27 Moroccan development efforts through 2011

Moroccan installed and planned capacities

Table 3-28 Moroccan installed and planned capacities through 2011

Moroccan-specific issues

Moroccan CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-23 Moroccan CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

South Africa

South African development activities to date

Table 3-29 South African development efforts through 2011

South African installed and planned capacities

Table 3-30 South African installed and planned capacities through 2011

South African-specific issues

South African CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-24 South African CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Spain

Spanish development activities to date

Table 3-31 Spanish development efforts through 2011

Spanish installed and planned capacities

Table 3-32 Spanish installed and planned capacities through 2011

Spanish-specific issues

Spanish CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-25 Spanish CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

United States

US development activities to date

Table 3-33 US development efforts through 2011

US installed and planned capacities

Table 3-34 US installed and planned capacities through 2011

US-specific issues

US CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

Figure 3-26 US CSP market forecast 2012 - 2016

African Nation's Activities

Other African national development activities to date

Table 3-35 Other African national development efforts through 2011

Other African nation's installed and planned capacities

Table 3-36 Other African nation's installed and planned capacities through 2011

Other-African national specific issues

Other National Activities

Other national development activities to date

Table 3-37 Other national development efforts through 2011

Other nation's installed and planned capacities

Table 3-38 Other nation's installed and planned capacities through 2011

Other national specific issues

Chapter 4 CSP Components: Description, Use, and Markets

Basis of Forecasts

Figure 4-1 Components as a percentage of plant costs

Engineering, Construction, and Procurement Companies

Table 4-1 ECP firms for installed and planned CSP facilities

Figure 4-2 Market share by EPC firm

High Tech Components

Mirrors, Frames and Cleaning Systems

Desired properties of CSP mirrors

Mirrors: Glass, plastic film. or polished metal

Table 4-2 Feature comparison between mirror materials

Research in material choice

Table 4-3 Global research in mirror materials

Table 4-4 Research in CSP mirrors

Installed and planned installations of mirrors

Table 4-5 Installed mirrors by material options

Table 4-6 Planned installations of mirrors by material options

Mirrors Producers

Table 4-7 Global mirror manufacturers, installed and planned

Mirror Market and Forecasts

Figure 4-3 US and Global CSP Mirror Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-4 US and Global CSP Mirror Market: 2012 - 2016

Figure 4-5 US and Global CSP Mirror Market: 2016 - 2020

Frame systems

Table 4-8 Global CSP Frames manufacturers, installed and planned

Figure 4-6 US and Global CSP Frames Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-7 US and Global CSP Frames Market: 2012 - 2016

Cleaning Systems

Table 4-9 Cleaning system manufacturers, installed and planned

Figure 4-8 US and Global CSP Cleaning System Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-9 US and Global CSP Cleaning System Market: 2012 - 2016

Receivers and Heat Flow Systems

Receiver, receiver support and interconnections

Desirable properties in receivers

Table 4-10 Feature comparison between Receiver designs

Research in Receiver Design

Table 4-11 Research in receiver design and materials

Installed and planned installations of mirrors

Table 4-12 Installed receivers by design

Table 4-13 Planned installations of receivers by design

Current Receiver Producers

Table 4-14 Manufacturers of receiver components

Receiver Market and Forecasts

Figure 4-10 US and Global CSP Receiver Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-11 US and Global CSP Receiver Market: 2012 - 2016

Collection, piping, valves and traps

Issues unique to CSP

Operating temperature range

Environmental conditions

Length of service

Longevity of service

Accessibility for preventative maintenance and performance issues

Table 4-15 Collection and piping issues unique to CSP

Companies with installed piping systems and experience

Table 4-16 Companies with installed piping systems and experience

Collection as a function of plant parameters

Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF)

Desirable properties in HTF

Table 4-17 Feature comparison between HTF systems

Research in heat transfer fluids

Table 4-18 Research in heat transfer fluids

Installed and planned installations of HTF

Table 4-19 Heat transfer fluids in installed CSP plants

Table 4-20 Heat transfer fluids selected for planned CSP plants

HTF Market and Forecast

Figure 4-12 US and Global CSP HTF Market: 2007 - 2011

Figure 4-13 US and Global CSP HTF Market: 2012 - 2016

Established Components

Steam Generation Plant

Table 4-21 Unique CSP Steam Plant Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-14 US and Global CSP Steam Plant Installations

Figure 4-15 US and Global CSP Steam Plant Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Cooling

Table 4-22 Unique CSP Cooling Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-16 US and Global CSP Cooling Installations

Figure 4-17 US and Global CSP Cooling Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Thermal Storage by Molten Salts

Table 4-23 Unique CSP Thermal Storage Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-18 US and Global CSP Thermal Storage Installations

Figure 4-19 US and Global CSP Thermal Storage Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Sun Tracking Systems

Table 4-24 Unique CSP Sun Tracking Requirements/ Opportunities

Figure 4-20 US and Global CSP Sun Tracking Installations

Figure 4-21 US and Global CSP Sun Tracking Market Forecast 2012 - 2017

Materials of Construction

Figure 4-22 Percentage of cost of CSP installations by material of construction

Significant issues concerning materials of construction: availability, cost

Steel

Table 4-25 Steel usage in CSP

Figure 4-23 US and Global steel market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Copper

Table 4-26 Copper usage in CSP

Figure 4-24 US and Global copper market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Brass

Table 4-27 Brass usage in CSP

Figure 4-25 US and Global brass market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Aluminum

Table 4-28 Aluminum usage in CSP

Figure 4-26 US and Global aluminum market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Concrete

Table 4-29 Concrete usage in CSP

Figure 4-27 US and Global concrete market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Molten Salts

Table 4-30 Molten salts usage in CSP

Figure 4-28 US and Global molten salts market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Silica

Table 4-31 Silica usage in CSP

Figure 4-29 US and Global silica market forecast in CSP, 2012 -2016

Chapter 5 Market Promotion, Distribution, and Trends

Promotion of CSP Market

General environmental movement

Figure 5-1 Growth in public demand for renewable energy sourcing

Desire for energy independence

Table 5-1 History of energy independence efforts in the US

Fear of lack of access to oil

Table 5-2 Relationship between the "Islamic Spring" uprisings, oil resources, and CSP investments

Fear of nuclear power

Table 5-3 Shifts in perception of nuclear power after 2010 Japanese tsunami

Electrical Distribution by Region

Figure 5-2 Schematic of generic electric grid

North America

US electric grid

Table 5-4 Role of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC),

Figure 5-3 Major distribution lines of continental US electric grid

Electricity generation in Hawaii and Alaska

Figure 5-4 Major distribution lines of Hawaiian and Alaskan electric grids

Table 5-5 Role of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC),

Table 5-6 Upgrades to US electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Canadian electric grid

Figure 5-5 Major distribution lines of Canadian electric grid

Mexican and Central American electric grid

Table 5-7 Status of Mexican and Central American electric grids

Figure 5-6 Major distribution lines within Central America

Table 5-8 Upgrades to Central American electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

South America

Table 5-9 Status of South America's electric grid

Figure 5-7 Major distribution lines within South America

Table 5-10 Upgrades to South American electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Europe and Russia

Electrical Distribution within Europe

Table 5-11 Status of European electric grid

Figure 5-8 Major distribution lines within Europe

Table 5-12 Upgrades to European electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Electrical Distribution within Russia

Table 5-13 Status of Russian electric grid

Figure 5-9 Major distribution lines within Russia

Table 5-14 Upgrades to Russian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Asia, India, and China

Electrical Distribution within Asia

Table 5-15 Status of Asia's electric grids

Figure 5-10 Major distribution lines within Asia

Table 5-16 Upgrades to Asian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Electrical Distribution within India

Table 5-17 Status of India's electric grids

Figure 5-11 Major distribution lines within India

Table 5-18 Upgrades to Indian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Electrical Distribution within China

Table 5-19 Status of China's electric grids

Figure 5-12 Major distribution lines within China

Table 5-20 Upgrades to Chinese electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Australia

Electrical Distribution within Australia

Table 5-21 Status of Australia's electric grids

Figure 5-13 Major distribution lines within Australia

Table 5-22 Upgrades to Australian electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

Africa

Electrical Distribution within Africa

Table 5-23 Status of Africa's electric grids

Figure 5-14 Major distribution lines within Africa

Table 5-24 Upgrades to African electric grid to handle full CSP production by 2030

CSP Market Trends

Investment Climate

Figure 5-15 Investments over time and world events

Public opinion

Figure 5-16 Public demand for solar energy

Proliferation of demonstration plants

Table 5-25 Recent demonstration plants

Ease of entry compared to other renewable energies

Table 5-26 New construction costs as a function of location and energy source

Continued need for premium pricing

Figure 5-17 Relative declines in power generation by energy type

Chapter 6 Competitive Profiles [selected from list]

Abengoa USA/ Abengoa Spain

ACCIONA Solar Power/ACCIONA Energia

Alanod

Albiasa Solar

Ausra

Beacon Solar

Boeing

Bright Source Energy

Carrizo Energy

Cristaleria Espanola

Dow chemical

DuPont

Ener-T Global

Epuron

Eskom

E-solar

EuroTrough

Flabeg

Florida Power and Light

Grupo Enhol

HelioDynamics

Industrial Solar Technology Corp

Inland Energy

Naugatuck Glass

Paneltec Corp

Pilkington

Radco Industries

ReflecTech

Samca

SCHOTT Solar

Sener Group

Siemens

Sinoy Mirror

Sky Fuel

SoquiMich

Solar Millennium AG

Solar Power Group

Solel Solar Systems

Solargenix Energy

Sopogy

Stirling Energy Systems

Chapter 7 End Users

Public End Users

Utility Companies

Table 7-1 US Utilities operating CSP

Public perception of renewable energy

Figure 7-1 Changes in public perception over time

Perception of CSP vs. other renewable energy sources

Trends in public perception

Public willingness to pay premium pricing for renewable energy

Figure 7-2 Distribution of premium price options and acceptance

Industrial End Users

Uses by industry

Table 7-2 CSP Industrial Applications

Motivation factors for industrial users

Table 7-3 Leading motivators for industrial CSP use

Implementation Trends of industrial users

Table 7-4 Implementation Trends of Industrial CSP Applications

Appendices

List of Abbreviations

Selected marketers contact information

Selected Organizations, Research Institutes, and Universities- contact information

Installed and Planned CSP Facilities

Selected CSP Facilities: Profiles and contact information

To order this report:Renewable energy Industry: Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

Market Research Report

Check our

Industry Analysis and Insights

CONTACT
Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: nbo@reportlinker.com
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626

SOURCE Reportlinker

A New Resource for Hydraulic Fracturing Information

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:25:00 +0000

A New Resource for Hydraulic Fracturing Information

PR Newswire

LIVONIA, Mich., Jan. 30, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Foley, Baron & Metzger, PLLC, a Detroit-area law firm, has launched a new resource page at www.fbmlaw.com/blog in response to mounting claims and lawsuits from incidents related to hydraulic fracturing.

Hydraulic fracturing, often called fracking, is a method of drilling for natural gas reserves, oil and geothermal energy in deep shale formations.

Richard Baron, the environmental practice group leader at Foley, Baron & Metzger, said, "Fracking presents unique challenges to all stakeholders involved in this process."

Industry professionals, including representatives of insurance companies, oil and gas companies, and environmental science and environmental protection organizations, are facing unique challenges in this emerging area of resource recovery.

Baron was recently invited to speak before a large multi-state audience of insurance professionals about hydraulic fracturing issues. After seeing the need from this industry, the web resource was created.

Baron said his firm wants to establish a resource that makes it easier for professionals to navigate the complexities that surround the topic. This includes the circumstances that arise from fracking-related events such as a surface spill caused by a natural disaster or pollution from the negligent release of hazardous waste materials.

The dedicated web resource includes both primary and secondary source materials to help evaluate issues ranging from federal and state laws and regulations to allegations of environmental contamination by fracking processes.

Foley, Baron & Metzger, PLLC, located in Livonia, Michigan, is a broad-service law firm providing a wide range of legal services, with a strong environmental practice including, environmental litigation, environmental site assessments and compliance audits, Clean Water Act, mold issues, CERCLA, RCRA and NREPA issues. For more information on FBM, visit www.fbmlaw.com, or to access their new Hydraulic Fracturing Resource Page, visit www.fbmlaw.com/blog.

Contact:

Richard Baron
rbaron@fbmlaw.com
Foley, Baron & Metzger, PLLC
38777 Six Mile Road, Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152

This press release was issued through eReleases(R). For more information, visit eReleases Press Release Distribution at http://www.ereleases.com.

SOURCE Foley, Baron & Metzger, PLLC

Pennsylvania Elk Country Visitor Center Honored for Energy Conservation Achievement

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:58:55 +0000

Pennsylvania Elk Country Visitor Center Honored for Energy Conservation Achievement

PR Newswire

HARRISBURG, Pa., Jan. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Pennsylvania's widely acclaimed Elk Country Visitor Center has earned independent honors for energy efficiency and environmental design, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Secretary Richard Allan announced today.

"We are proud to learn yet another major DCNR Pennsylvania Wilds project has been awarded Gold LEED status by the U.S. Green Building Council," Allan said. "Similar recognition recently was extended to the new Nature Inn at Bald Eagle in Centre County and the Tiadaghton State Forest Resource Management Center in Lycoming County."

LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is an internationally recognized mark of design, construction and maintenance excellence that seeks to ensure buildings reflect the highest environmental and energy efficiency. Offered at four levels for new construction -- Certified, Silver, Gold and Platinum -- the ratings gauge water and energy use, materials, and other design criteria.

"We recognize the effort that went into the design and construction of these three buildings, and the LEED honors they received can only broaden a visitor's experience," Allan said.

"The accent here is on learning," Allan said. "When the ever-increasing Elk Country Visitor Center crowds learn to 'Bugle like an Elk' or wander the new 'Discovery Room' exhibits, we're also hoping to introduce them to the center's unique rainwater collection or geothermal heating and cooling systems.

"Guests at the Nature Inn are being introduced to modern accommodations and an up-close experience with nature, but they also may be using solar-heated shower and laundry water for the first time. Meanwhile, visitors at the Tiadaghton State Forest Resource Management Center will learn how 'green' roofs help minimize storm runoff and reduce heating and cooling costs."

Beyond reduced waste and increased energy and water conservation, lower building operating costs justify efforts to attain LEED certification, Allan said.

"The Nature Inn was designed to be 26 percent more efficient than an average building built to meet code, and electric bills the past year show the building actually is using 29 percent less energy than the baseline case," Allan said. "That's an estimated annual energy savings of about $5,400."

The Elk Country Visitor Center opened in September 2010 on 245 acres of DCNR land in Benezette, Elk County. It offers a four-dimensional story theater, permitting visitors to see and feel storms and other natural events; interactive interpretive exhibits; wildlife trails and viewing areas; wagon rides; year-round restrooms; and parking for cars, RVs and buses.

State funds totaling $6 million were earmarked for center construction with another $6 million coming from private donations. In 2009, DCNR partnered with the nonprofit Keystone Elk Country Alliance, a Pennsylvania-based wildlife conservation organization, to manage the center under a concessionaire management agreement with DCNR. The alliance receives no state funding to operate the center. Its mission is to conserve and enhance Pennsylvania's elk country for future generations, and educate the public about conservation and resource stewardship.

The center's LEED features include: rainwater collection and reuse systems; night sky-friendly light fixtures; use of locally available materials and certified wood from responsibly harvested timber; and geothermal heating and cooling systems.

The Nature Inn at Bald Eagle, the first facility of its type in Pennsylvania's nationally recognized state park system, opened in September 2010, offering visitors modern accommodations and an up-close experience with nature. As a southern entrance point to the 12-county Pennsylvania Wilds, the 16-room inn affords visitors comfortable accommodations, wildlife watching and many other outdoor activities.

The inn's LEED energy-saving and conservation features include: a high-efficiency geothermal heating and cooling system; solar collectors to heat water for showers and laundry; rain barrels and large cisterns to collect and store rainwater for flushing toilets; low-water consumption; widespread use of Pennsylvania hardwoods from certified forests; and direct access to hiking and biking trails.

The Tiadaghton State Forest District Resource Management Center in Waterville supports the district's staffing and operational needs. It houses foresters, rangers and other employees, and serves as a year-round welcome center and restroom facility for state forest visitors. The building also serves as a portal to the Pine Creek Valley and the Pennsylvania Wilds regions.

LEED features include a vegetation-covered roof; bike trail; native landscaping species; reduction of paved parking spaces; storm-water retention; roof water collection and re-use; high performance insulation; sun shades and light shelves; energy efficient lighting; and geothermal heating and cooling.

For more information on the Elk Country Visitor Center, visit www.ElkCountryVisitorCenter.com. Details on the Nature Inn at Bald Eagle can be found at http://natureinnatbaldeagle.com/. For information on Tiadaghton State Forest, visit www.dcnr.state.pa.us (click on "Find a Forest").

Media contact: Terry Brady, 717-772-9101

SOURCE Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

European Utilities Insight 2012

Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:46:36 +0000

European Utilities Insight 2012

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, Jan. 23, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

European Utilities Insight 2012

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0762942/European-Utilities-Insight-2012.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Renewable_energy

A number of key developments in the European energy landscape will affect utilities in 2012. Utilities will need to proactively adjust for the impact of poor economic conditions, and adapt to tougher rules on decarbonization, energy efficiency, and consumer protection.Using expert analysis of regulation and policy changes set to shape 2012 you will be able to mitigate risk and plan your strategy accordingly.By assessing the impact of renewables funding and the impact on the management of energy grids, you will be able to spot investment opportunities.With insight on the strategies key European players are adopting, you will have the market intelligence to maneuver and outperform in 2012 and beyond.Looking at the key aspects shaping the retail and consumer markets 2012 you will be able to develop robust acquisition and retention strategies.With insight into how key developments in the European energy utility landscape will affect your business in 2012, you will be able to proactively adjust for the impact of the recession on end-user energy demand. This key market trends report looks at what the major opportunities will be in 2012 to help you plan your strategy to profit from them.Provides a comprehensive view of trends emerging in the European market to help with business and strategy planning.Analyzes the impact of the region's key developments and what strategies companies should adopt as a consequence.

OVERVIEW

•Introduction

•Methodology

REGULATION AND POLICY

•Energy regulation and policy landscape in Europe

- Concrete legislative steps will follow the EU's energy strategy 2020 proposals

- The potential impact of the EU energy strategy 2020 on utilities

- Renewable energy support mechanisms

- Regulatory policies

- Fiscal incentives

- Public financing

- Renewable energy 2020 targets versus achievements

•Current scenario: changing regulatory and policy landscape

- Evolving offshore wind power policy

- Some key markets will see a reduction in feed-in tariffs for solar photovoltaics

- Country-level actions

- Developing the EU energy infrastructure priorities for 2020

- Priority corridors for electricity, gas, and oil

- Preparing the longer-term networks

•Developing the post-2020 regulatory framework

- European energy strategy for the next decade will take into account longer term objectives, in the form of the Energy Roadmap 2050

•Author's view

- Summary of regulation and policy trends in 2012

- Emerging solar PV markets in Europe need strong policy certainty to gain investor confidence

- A strong and clear offshore wind power policy will benefit wind farm developers

- EU's energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 are a boon for network operators

- The EU's Energy Roadmap 2050 will present unique opportunities and challenges

COMPANIES AND MARKETS

•2012 strategies for key European utilities

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: E.ON

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: GDF Suez

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: EDF

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Enel

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Endesa

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Centrica

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Iberdrola

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: SSE

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: RWE

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Vattenfall

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Gazprom

- Assessment of European utility strategies for 2012: Dong

•2012 European utility investment trends

- Trends in renewable and cleantech investment

- Projections for investment in power generation assets

•Pricing outlook and drivers for European energy markets in 2012

- The carbon market is oversupplied with EU Emission Allowances, and this will continue through 2012 and beyond

- European gas and power prices should ease in 2012

•Author's view

- In 2012, European utilities will need to protect core strengths and look for growth opportunities outside a beleaguered Europe

- A splintering of the eurozone would pose major challenges for European utilities

- Summary of companies and markets trends in 2012

GENERATION AND NETWORKS

•Power generation economics

- Over the coming decade levelized cost comparisons suggest that fossil fuels will continue to play an important role, and offshore wind and solar costs are expected to fall

- Declining rates of growth in European clean tech investment are expected, hindered by uncertain and slow-paced government support

•Power generation market trends

- Europe faces tough additional capacity decisions in changing market conditions, and Germany's exit from nuclear and transition to renewables will be a showcase to the world

- Coal will decline in Western Europe, but energy security needs and co-firing will ensure that unabated coal does not completely die out

- CCS is the lifeline for coal and will face continued obstacles to its development through 2012, but the EU NER300 Scheme will provide an added boost

- Gas is the fuel of choice for power generators, and European shale gas exploration activity will increase in 2012

- Nuclear is not dead post Fukushima: there will be added emphasis on safety, which will only add to rising costs

- Solar is fast approaching grid parity and concentrated solar power will see strong growth too, but is limited by European sunlight levels

- If it was not for cost, the future for wind would be entirely offshore; as costs decrease offshore wind will become increasingly attractive

- The biomass industry is poised for growth

- Wave and tidal power is fast becoming ready for mass commercialization

- Hydroelectric power, especially pumped storage in Nordic and Alpine regions, promises the most growth to accompany intermittent renewables on the grid

- Geothermal energy is limited in Europe: Enhanced Geothermal Systems will dominate

- Microgeneration is set to grow but rests heavily upon feed-in tariffs, which are being cut across Europe

•Power generation networks

- Preparation activity for the smart grid will increase in 2012, as it is expected to be fully enabled by 2025 across Europe

•Author's view

- Summary of generation and networks trends in 2012

CONSUMER AND RETAIL

•Retail and consumer trends for utilities in 2012

- Macroeconomics will heavily determine customer and supplier behavior for much of 2012

- Heightened customer credit risk requires stricter levels of governance and transparency

•Legislation and regulation will shape the retail market landscape

- UK Retail Market Review

- UK Green Deal

- UK Renewable Heat Incentive

- The UK's Carbon Emissions Reduction Target, Community Energy Saving Programme, and Energy Company Obligation

- EC Energy Efficiency Plan 2011

- EC Energy Efficiency Directive 2012

- For the energy supply sector:

- Other European Energy Efficiency Legislation

- The trend for 2012 is clear: energy suppliers will have to play by even tougher market rules

•Residential energy sector

- Rising retail prices will increase consumers' frustration with their suppliers and politicians

- In the face of continuing price rises consumers avoid switching rather than making use of it

- Consumers mistrust energy markets to the extent that they are not interested in participating

- Utilities are looking for value-added services to aid customer retention and brand building

- Energy retailers' product portfolios will need to cater for different levels of risk appetite

- Suppliers will experiment with alternative marketing channels to improve their image

- Suppliers will be trying out new and more sophisticated segmentation strategies

- Utilities will look at all possibilities to reduce cost-to-serve

- Retailers increasingly value dual fuel and online billing for improving operational efficiency

- Smart metering will gradually become the norm for many consumers over 2012

- Direct debit and online banking reduce cost-to-serve, but customer apathy prevails

- Energy efficiency measure installations are taking off across Europe

•Industrial and commercial energy sector

- Third-party intermediaries are being squeezed as suppliers aim to regain control of customers

- Business customers require help with energy prices and effective communication channels

- 2012 could become a key year for energy services if suppliers can overcome cost concerns

- Awareness of green tariffs across Europe is high but uptake rates remain low

- The energy services outlook for 2012 is positive if customers are targeted with suitable offers

•Author's view

- Summary of consumer and retail trends in 2012

CONCLUSION

•Tougher markets and tougher rules will put the squeeze on European utilities in 2012

APPENDIX

•Disclaimer

TABLES

•Table: FiT price determination mechanisms

•Table: Europe renewable energy supporting regulatory policies, 2011

•Table: Europe renewable energy supporting incentives and public financing policies, 2011

•Table: Planned gas network corridors for 2020

•Table: Fossil fuel emission levels (£/billion British thermal units of energy input), 1998

•Table: Predicted UK and EU offshore wind capacity (GW), 2011

•Table: Current offshore wind capacity and capacity under construction (MW), 2011

•Table: Interconnections for first phase of European supergrid (GW), 2011

•Table: The most and least effective marketing channels in Europe

FIGURES

•Figure: The EU energy strategy 2020

•Figure: EU renewable energy support mechanism

•Figure: Renewable energy's share of EU 27's final energy consumption in 2009 versus 2020 targets

•Figure: EU offshore wind power installed capacity (MW), 2000–10

•Figure: EU energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond

•Figure: Proportion of total power generation projects currently under construction, by European region

•Figure: Proportion of projects currently under construction in Europe, by type

•Figure: EU carbon emission reduction prices

•Figure: UK National Balancing Point wholesale gas: average month-ahead prices

•Figure: UK National Balancing Point wholesale gas: average seasonal 2012 delivery prices

•Figure: UK baseload power wholesale prices: seasonal forward contracts for 2012

•Figure: UK wholesale baseload power: average month-ahead prices

•Figure: Major energy utilities operational in the eurozone countries

•Figure: Comparative levelized costs of renewable power generation in the UK (£/MWh), 2011

•Figure: Comparative cost of renewable power generation in the UK (£/MWh), 2017f

•Figure: Comparative levelized cost of electricity in the UK (£/MWh) 2010–2023f

•Figure: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Europe Electricity Generation (billion kWh), 2010–20f

•Figure: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Europe Capacity (GW), 2010–18f

•Figure: Nuclear capacity growth forecast (GW), 2010–2020f

•Figure: Projected renewable power generation capacity in the EU (GW), 2009 and 2020f

•Figure: Projected total wind power capacity onshore and offshore (GW), 2005–2020f

•Figure: Calculated average annual growth for capacity of biomass electricity, all biomass input categories (percentage per year), 2005–20f

•Figure: Projected tidal, wave, and ocean energy electric capacity (MW), 2005–20f

•Figure: Schematic for smart grid, 2011

•Figure: Global next generation smart grid technology market value ($bn), 2010–20f

•Figure: EU27: total electricity spending 2010 (€bn)

•Figure: EU27: total gas spending 2010 (€bn)

•Figure: European power demand forecast (TWh), 2011–20f

•Figure: Absolute inflation (%), by country, 2000–16f

•Figure: UK consumer income remains squeezed

•Figure: UK consumers will have little room to maneuver financially

•Figure: Domestic retail energy prices in the EU27 including all taxes 2011 (€/kWh)

•Figure: Annual switching rates in European domestic retail markets 2011 (%)

•Figure: Europe: market positioning of major energy retail companies, 2009

•Figure: European utilities' product offerings, by product type

•Figure: Marketing channels, by group

•Figure: Customer segmentation strategies for utilities

•Figure: Aggregated total cost-to-serve of the UK energy retail market

•Figure: Clearly there is a tension between cost-to-serve and service levels, but not in all cases

•Figure: Typical estimated average cost-to-serve by billing functionality (£/customer)

•Figure: Average billing frequency for electricity in Europe

•Figure: Cumulative investment in residential energy efficiency by type for EU27 (£bn), 2010–30f

•Figure: Expected annual investment in residential energy efficiency across the EU27 (£bn), 2010–30f

•Figure: European utilities' online energy efficiency offerings, 2010

•Figure: Commercial retail gas prices in the EU27 excluding VAT 2011 (€/kWh)

•Figure: Commercial retail electricity prices in the EU27 excluding VAT 2011 (€/kWh)

•Figure: UK real gross domestic product (£m) compared to changes in the percentage of intermediated contracts for business-to-business power, 2005–10

•Figure: Business customers' energy priorities in the near future (excluding "do not know" responses)

•Figure: H ave you or your company engaged in advice, monitoring, planning, buying, or implementing any energy efficiency or carbon reduction measures and technology?

•Figure: I n the next three years what activities do you and your business anticipate engaging in?

•Figure: MEUs: a re there any services that you would like your energy supplier to offer you?

•Figure: SMEs: are there any services that you would like your energy supplier to offer you?

Companies mentioned

ALSTOM, Aquamarine Power, AREVA SA, CMS Energy Corporation, Deutsche Post DHL, Deutsche Telekom AG, EDF Energy plc, Electrabel, Electricity Supply Board, European Investment Bank, Gamesa Corporacion Tecnologica SA, General Mills, Inc., Hutchison 3G UK Limited, J Sainsbury plc, KfW Bankengruppe, Metcash Limited, Nectar, OAO Gazprom, PPL Corporation, Renault SA, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Royal KPN N.V., RWE npower, Schindler Holding Ltd., Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, SPE, Telstra Corporation Limited, Unit 4 N.V., Uralsvyazinform OJSC, Vattenfall, Voith GmbH, WPP Group plc

To order this report:

Renewable energy Industry: European Utilities Insight 2012

More Market Research Report

Check our Industry Analysis and Insights

CONTACT:
Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: nbo@reportlinker.com
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626

SOURCE Reportlinker