There were 1,853 press releases posted in the last 24 hours and 399,336 in the last 365 days.

Terminating Employee for Complaining About Harassment Not OK

Orange County Private Investigator

Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-3(a) states that it is unlawful for any employer to discriminate against an employee who has “opposed” a practice...

Investigating the facts behind the scenes can play a key role in the litigation of employment cases. And in these cases, nothing trumps experience...
— John A. DeMarr, P.I.
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, May 18, 2015 /EINPresswire.com/ -- A jury awarded more than $1.5 million in a lawsuit where three women, despite never making formal complaints, asked their supervisor to stop behavior they felt was sexual harassment. Each of them, along with a male co-worker who also found the behavior offensive, was terminated, but only one of the women was fired by the harassing supervisor. The remaining three received negative performance reviews, and official decisions to end their employment were made by other parties.

After filing with the Equality Employment Opportunity Commission, the four filed a lawsuit that resulted in a jury award of over 1.5 million dollars in compensatory and punitive damages. The employer appealed, and the Sixth District U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the award. The court, in extending Title VII protection of employees from formal complaints of unlawful practices to simple acts such as just “telling a supervisor to stop the conduct.” EEOC v. New Breed Logistics, No. 13-6250, 2015 BL 114197, (6th Cir. Apr. 22, 2015)

Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-3(a) (Opposition Clause) states that it is unlawful for any employer to discriminate against an employee who has “opposed” a practice, which is an unlawful employment practice. Previous interpretations of Title VII had generally only viewed making a formal complaint, as being protected from retaliation. The appeals court endorsed the trial court’s decision that protected conduct that “can be as simple as telling a supervisor to stop.” Additionally, even though three claimants were terminated by others, the court extended liability for all four terminations since the harassing supervisor was “the driving force behind the employment action.”

“Investigating the facts behind the scenes can play a key role in the litigation of employment cases. And in these cases, nothing trumps experience”, says John A. DeMarr, P.I., a licensed California private investigator since 1985 and president of John A DeMarr Private Investigators. “Our 30 years of experience makes all the difference in the level of service and the innovative approaches we can offer our clients. Our proven expertise results in a positive outcome where other process servers or private investigation firms often fail.”

John A. DeMarr, a well-known Orange County Private Investigator, has consistently provided innovative process service and private investigation services over thirty years of experience – always reasonably priced, and always within the bounds of applicable law. Courts have upheld DeMarr’s techniques, resulting in the successful jury verdicts, case settlements as well as subpoena service and post-judgment enforcement results against deadbeat parents, defendants evading service of process, residents of gated communities, corporations and partnerships, difficult to locate unfaithful spouses and others.

John A. DeMarr, Private Investigator’s expertise provides important new tools for creditors owed money; for financial institutions and insurance companies; and, perhaps most importantly, to injured plaintiffs across the globe.

To learn more: demarr.com Toll free 877-493-3463.

John DeMarr
John A DeMarr, P.I.
877 493 3463
email us here