There were 691 press releases posted in the last 24 hours and 168,953 in the last 365 days.

Daily Briefing by the Press Secretary Jay Carney, 03/11/14

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

March 11, 2014

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

12:47 P.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the White House. I don't have any announcements at the top, so I'll go straight to the Associated Press. Julie.

Q Thanks, Jay. Does the White House believe, as Senator Feinstein said this morning, that the CIA improperly searched a Senate Intel Committee computer network?

MR. CARNEY: Heres what I can tell you. This is a matter involving protocols established in 2009 for the interaction between committee staff and CIA staff and officials as part of the investigation the committee was undergoing. There have been periodic disputes about that process and, as you know, this is under investigation, these matters are under two separate investigations -- an IG review as well as a referral to the Department of Justice. So I'm not going to provide an analysis or assessment about --

Q That referral to the Department of Justice is not necessarily an investigation. Are you confirming theres now an investigation --

MR. CARNEY: No, I'm not. I would refer you to the Justice Department for any action they may or may not take. But I'm saying that this is because of a referral because of the IG review. In terms of allegations about activity, I'm not going to get into that. What I can say is that -- you saw the CIA Director say today that if there was any inappropriate activity by the CIA or SSCI staff he would, of course, want to get to the bottom of it. And certainly the President would agree with that.

Q But John Brennan was really careful in his language this morning. He said there hadnt been any CIA hacking of the Senate Intel computer network. Can you at least say that the White House was aware that there was a search that happened, whether or not you believe it was proper?

MR. CARNEY: Any specifics about the charges I'm not going to get into. What I can tell you is a couple of things. First, its important to stand back and look at what we're talking about here. We are talking about an investigation into activities that occurred under the previous administration that then candidate Barack Obama strenuously opposed, that he promised to end and which he ended very shortly after being sworn into office. He supports -- the President does and the administration does -- the committees investigation, its work. In fact, the President has made clear he seeks the declassification of the findings of that report when it is completed. So I think that's important as a starting point.

And again, when it comes to the interactions between the agency, on the one hand, and the committee, on the other, these are matters that are under review by an IG and are the subject of a referral to the Justice Department, so I'm not going to get into specifics about allegations.

Q Senator Feinstein said that in 2010, when the CIA, she alleges, took documents off of this computer network, she brought this to the White House, had a conversation with the White House counsel. Do you know if shes brought this matter of the January search to the White House counsel?

MR. CARNEY: Again, I don't have -- well, I don't have a specific readout of any meeting. What I can say is the White House counsel would get involved in this kind of discussion about this process because of institutional concerns surrounding these matters, again, even in this case, matters that involve a previous administration or previous White House.

Q So the White House counsel has been involved in conversations about this January search?

MR. CARNEY: That's not what I said. I don't have a specific --

Q You said they would be involved.

MR. CARNEY: Again, they would be involved in discussions about some of the issues between the committee and the CIA because of institutional concerns involving prerogatives and national security issues, again, having to do with the previous administration or previous White House.

Q And has the President or any senior staff spoken to John Brennan about this matter?

MR. CARNEY: Well, let me just say, folks here and in the administration have been in regular consultation with Chairman Feinstein about the broader issues here. Weve made clear that we want to see the reports findings declassified. And obviously, there have been conversations as a routine matter between the administration, the White House, the Director and the Chairman.


Q I wanted to ask you about Malaysia briefly. Is the FBI not sending a team? Have the other U.S. officials participating in the investigation arrived and made any reports yet that you can talk about? And also, could you comment on the Iranian origin of the two individuals who appear to have used stolen passports to board the flight?

MR. CARNEY: What I can tell you is that the United States government is in communication across agencies and with international partners to provide any appropriate assistance in the investigation. Officials from the National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Aviation Administration have arrived in the region to provide necessary assistance -- any necessary assistance. The FBI is involved, also providing assistance. But in terms of officials that have arrived, thats from the NTSP and the FAA.

Also, the 7th Fleet has sent assets to assist in search efforts. These include a PC-3 Orion aircraft from the Kadena Airbase in Okinawa, which has long-range search radar and communications capabilities to contribute to the search efforts. In addition to the USS Pinckney, an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer, the USS Kidd, an Arleigh Burke-class missile destroyer, is now in the vicinity and they have helicopters equipped for search efforts on board.

The Pinckney and Kidd are working alongside a host of other nations -- U.S., China, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam and Australia. As of this morning, there are a total of 22 fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft and 40 ships that are searching for Flight 370. So this is an international effort.

On the matter that you raised in terms of the passports, I can tell you that we do not have enough information -- and this was the case yesterday -- to comment on the causes of this incident. I would note what Interpol has said about those issues involving the fraudulent passports, but we dont have any information at this point yet that would allow us to make a conclusion about the cause.

Q On Ukraine, the United States is today conducting joint air drills in Poland and, apparently, also planning joint exercises with Bulgaria and Romania in the Black Sea. What, if any, message should Russia draw from those exercises?

MR. CARNEY: Well, first of all, that we obviously have provided stepped-up assistance to those countries, in this case, and this is part of our effort to work with our international partners and allies and to speak in a clear voice, together, that the actions taken by Russia to intervene militarily in contravention of international law and in violation of Ukraines territorial integrity is something that we all oppose.

So we are working to see if the Russians are willing to resolve this matter diplomatically. Secretary Kerry has been in regular contact with Foreign Minister Lavrov; they spoke again today. And those conversations will continue.

In the meantime, as weve made clear, there have been and there will be costs to Russias action. And we have a flexible tool in the executive order that the President signed that will allow us to calibrate the cost depending on the decisions that Russia makes, depending on whether or not Russia decides to avail itself of an opportunity here to pursue its concerns in Ukraine in a peaceful, diplomatic way.

Q On to a domestic issue, if I could -- this is about the GM recall. This is a recall affecting something like 1.6 million cars for a flaw that was responsible for 13 deaths, of problems first reported 10 years ago, and Congress is now investigating the regulators response. Is the White House satisfied with the way the regulator handled this?

MR. CARNEY: Well, I can tell you that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a formal investigation into whether GM shared the information they had about this issue as quickly as they should have. So since that investigation has been opened, I would have to refer you to the NHTSA for more details.

Q Thanks.


Q Getting back to Senator Feinsteins comments, she said earlier this morning, the CIA just went and searched the committees computer. Is it the White House position that shes wrong?

MR. CARNEY: Jim, as I think I just said, theres a review by an Inspector General, theres a referral to the Department of Justice, so Im not going to comment on specific allegations about the disputes over the protocols that were established in 2009.

Q Senator Feinstein is pretty careful about what she says and does not say on the Senate floor. For her to go -- for the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee to go to the floor and make that kind of serious allegation, it just seems that it would warrant a stronger response from this White House as to whether or not its true, not just come back with, well get back to you on this.

MR. CARNEY: No, thats not what I said, Jim. I think you might have noted that the Director of the CIA gave an interview today in which he addressed these issues on the record.

Q -- on hacking. Shes saying searching computers.

MR. CARNEY: He was asked many questions by one of Chucks colleagues and answered them I think forthrightly. So I would point you to the CIA Directors comments. And then I would note that there is an active Inspector General review of this matter; there is referral to the Department of Justice, so I can refer you to the Justice Department.

And I can say that, again, the White Houses perspective on this is reflected in the fact that we have made clear to the committee that we support declassification of the findings of the report. That report, as I understand it, again, looking at what the CIA Director said today, has not been submitted for declassification yet. But we support that process. After all, this is an investigation into practices that the President strongly opposed, that he made clear that were inconsistent with our values as a nation and that he ended shortly after taking office.

Q And getting back to Crimea, you mentioned that Secretary Kerry and Foreign Minister Lavrov had spoken. Have the Russians acknowledged these moves that theyve taken in Crimea? I know that as of late last week, there were still some questions as to whether theyd even acknowledged having forces in Crimea. Has President Putin acknowledged this? Has the Foreign Minister acknowledged this? MR. CARNEY: Its fair to say -- and this is reflected in public comments -- that there is a disagreement about basic facts and, on the one hand, you have the facts as we know them, that are clearly established and that are agreed to by people around the region and the world, and then the facts being asserted by Russian government officials that just dont reflect whats actually happened. And, again, as Ive said over the past week, the reports about lawlessness or abuse of Russian ethnic Ukrainians in Eastern Ukraine have no credible foundation as far as we can say.

Q No progress has been made on just agreeing on what the facts are? MR. CARNEY: Well, our focus is on resolving this diplomatically and peacefully. We acknowledge that Russia has real interests in Ukraine, and deep, historical, cultural and economic ties to Ukraine. And we believe that it is entirely appropriate and possible for Ukraine to integrate further with Europe, which is what so many Ukrainians desire, and even as it does so, maintain its very close and important relationship and ties to Russia. That is as it should be, in our view, and it is as it should be because it is what the Ukrainian people have expressed they want.

What is not acceptable is a violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, a violation of Ukraines territorial integrity. And that is what we have seen. And we are working very hard diplomatically on an effort to have the Russians pursue an off-ramp here -- to take an off-ramp here so that these disputes can be resolved diplomatically. If the concern here is about the plight of ethnic Russians in Crimea or in other parts of Ukraine, there is a way to address that that does not require the illegal mobilization of foreign troops or the annexation of -- an illegal annexation of the sovereign territory of another state.

Q And can I ask you very quickly about I notice youre not standing between two ferns, but I just wanted -- does the President have an expectation as to where youre going to be -- do you guys have an expectation as to where youre going to be at the end of this month? I know we might here some enrollment numbers later today.

MR. CARNEY: I believe thats the case that CMS will be releasing figures through February. Theres been some reporting that I think already indicates roughly where were going to be. And were confident in this final month of the open enrollment period that a lot of Americans are going to sign up and that a lot of young Americans are going to sign up. We saw that in earlier numbers, that the growth in enrollments is substantial in the 18-34 age category, and we expect that to continue.

The Presidents interview with Zach Galifianakis on Between Two Ferns was designed to reach Americans where they live. And they watch the show in huge numbers -- I think the average video gets something like 6 million views. I'm convinced we're going to break that average. And in fact, as I was walking out here, I think we were close to 3 million, and that's a good thing. More importantly, we have seen that Funny or Die -- at least, again, as I was walking out here -- was the number-one referral to -- referral source late this morning. So that's a good thing. We're engaged in an effort to reach every -- what did you say?

Q -- everything else --

MR. CARNEY: I think what it says is that gone are the days when your broadcasts, or yours, or yours, can reach everybody that we need to reach. And --

Q You bring in Zach Galifianakis and all your problems are solved?

MR. CARNEY: I didnt say that. We're involved in a multifaceted effort to reach communities out there of folks who can benefit from quality, affordable health insurance, can avail themselves of the options that theyll find on And we're looking for creative ways to do that. This was one of them.

Q -- explain that, though? If it's the number-one referral -- like how many referrals did you get from that? What does that mean?

MR. CARNEY: CMS might have it. It means that --

Q Today, they would --

MR. CARNEY: Since it went live, the number of referrals to or site referrals was highest from Funny or Die, as I understand it.

Q -- information on how many referrals you got from Zach Galifianakis?

MR. CARNEY: I don't have a specific number. The point is not the number within a few hours, but that very quickly this video went viral and that -- not just because people thought it was funny and the regular viewers of Funny or Die clicked on it and watched it, but that it was getting folks -- the video itself was causing the action that we hoped it would cause, which is getting folks to go to and look at the options available to them and hopefully enroll.

Q Can you make sure we get those numbers? Because we need to be able to verify. You can't just say this is where all the referrals are coming from without a number to back that up.

MR. CARNEY: Well get you the information we have on it. I mean it's -- we'll get you the information we have. This is part of an effort to enroll as many people as we can before the open enrollment period [ends]. And youll obviously judge very critically when the time comes how we've done in that effort, as you have all along. I can assure you that the Funny or Die video will be one of the reasons we get young Americans to, one of the reasons we get young Americans to enroll in health insurance programs, but not the only way.

Q Jay, how much discussion was there in the White House about the dignity of the office and whether or not -- in order to reach these people who don't watch us at 6:30 p.m., or who don't watch this briefing -- how much -- the balance there, how much the dignity of the office might be lost? This was an interview like no other probably ever done by a President.

MR. CARNEY: Safe to say.

Q So how much discussion was there in the White House about this?

MR. CARNEY: We're constantly looking at different ways to reach Americans who don't necessarily get information about from evening news broadcasts or from the newspapers, but who might either watch the town hall we did last week with Spanish-language networks, or watch Funny or Die, or watch some of the other things we've done -- the webMD interview that we're doing, and get the information they need or at least get motivated to find the information they need to decide whether or not theyre going to enroll.

Q I understand the purpose, but was the presidency in any way -- the presidency -- damaged or --


Q -- lost dignity because of this?

MR. CARNEY: I mean, we obviously assess opportunities that we have and look at whether or not theyre going to be successful and wise. I think we made the right call here.

Q Did the President know the questions that were going to be asked? Was it a comedy routine that was done in advance, or was this an actual interview? How much did he know about what going to happen?

MR. CARNEY: I think we knew that there would be an opportunity to talk about -- as the President says in it, that's why he was doing it -- and sort of loosely what the interview might look like. But theres a lot of adlibbing in there.

Q Would you call it scripted, or no?

MR. CARNEY: I don't get into -- you can ask the Funny or Die people. I can tell you theres a lot of adlibbing.

Q On the CIA allegations from Senator Feinstein, two things are on the table -- a violation of the 4th Amendment, alleged; violation of an executive order against domestic spying, alleged -- serious allegations. Do either of those raise in the Presidents mind doubts about what the CIA has done on his watch or John Brennans leadership of the agency?

MR. CARNEY: The President has great confidence in John Brennan and confidence in our intelligence community and in professionals at the CIA. On the specific matters that you correctly noted are alleged, theyre under review and I'm not going to comment on particulars of matters that are under review. I would point you to what the Director of the CIA said today publicly.

Q You mentioned that this administration is supportive of declassification of the Senate report. As you know, there are responses from the CIA to that Senate report, also classified, and a separate report that was ordered by Leon Panetta when he was CIA Director, also classified. Does this administration support the declassification of those other two sources of information and back-and-forth about the underlying question?

MR. CARNEY: I don't have an answer to the questions about other reports. What I can tell you is we support declassification of the findings of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee report and that that review or report is still being worked on, as I understand it, and has not yet been completed and, thus, submitted for assessment and declassification, which obviously is an important process because of the matters that are subject of the review.

But we strongly support that, and we strongly -- again, lets remember what this is about. This is about so-called enhanced interrogation techniques that this President made very clear he opposed as a candidate and when he was in the Senate, that he pledged to end because he did not believe the techniques were consistent with our values as a nation and that he did end very soon after taking the oath of office.

Q Well, let me follow the logic of the President supporting the CIA and the CIA Director. Brennan said at the Council of Foreign Relations this morning that the Senate report has a lot of things which he disagrees with -- contentions, point of facts. He said there were nuances missed. So for the publics understanding of this issue why not also support declassification of the CIA answers and the Panetta report --

MR. CARNEY: I'll take the question, Major. What I know is we support and have long supported the declassification of the findings of the SSCI report. What I also would point -- we're talking about the findings here, and that would be findings and assessments and conclusions that you just noted. But on the other matters, I'll have to take the question.

Q Okay. On Ukraine, can you help us understand if there is something you're trying to tell the international community, and specifically Vladimir Putin, when you say that Russia has real interests in Ukraine, deep historical ties? Is there a way that this can be finessed so that Crimea stays a part of Ukraine but Russian interests are politically recognized in a more visible way or a more palatable way to Russia? In other words, that this can be solved while meeting both the interests of now a government thats not only patrolling the streets, cutting off the Internet, shutting down all media, putting a complete stranglehold on a part of a sovereign nation -- can you get them to back away from that and find a way to thread a needle diplomatically and politically? Is that the ultimate goal here? And if that is the ultimate goal, can you explain what that might look like?

MR. CARNEY: The goal is to see the situation deescalate and for the Russian military personnel that are in Crimea to return to their bases and to return to levels that are consistent with the basing agreement Russia has with Ukraine, and for all violations of Ukraines sovereignty by a foreign nation and violations of Ukraines territorial integrity to cease.

What were talking about when we say that we absolutely recognize that Russia has interests in Ukraine and they include in Crimea, were referring specifically to the Black Sea Fleet base, for example, which is in Crimea, a Russian naval base, as part of an agreement with the sovereign nation of Ukraine and that we completely respect that. And thats consistent with our support for the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 that establishes that agreement, and is consistent with the way weve approached this challenge.

Were also sympathetic to concerns that Russia has as a general matter when it comes to either Russian nationals or ethnic Russians in Ukraine and whether or not their rights are being protected. And thats why we support dialogue between the Russian and Ukrainian government with international partners as part of a process that would lead to sending of international monitors from the OSCE or the United Nations who can on the ground assess whether or not the rights of ethnic Russians in Eastern Ukraine or Crimea or anywhere else are in jeopardy or being violated.

We have noted that thus far reports that that is happening havent proven to be credible, but we would certainly make clear and have made clear that it is our expectation that the Ukrainian government honor the rights of all of its citizens.

Q Does there come a point where Russian behavior in Crimea -- meaning these patrols, the cutting off of media, blocking of the Internet -- erases their legitimate other interests there because they have acted as an international bully?

MR. CARNEY: I think the best way to look at this, Major, is that there is an opportunity here to prevent the situation from becoming more acute and to prevent the cost to Russia from becoming even higher.

There have been and there will be costs for the actions that Russia has already taken by intervening militarily in a sovereign state. Weve talked about those at least from the United States. Weve seen actions taken by the European Union. And as you know, we are able to, because of the powers spelled out in the executive order, calibrate sanctions and other actions depending on the steps that Russia takes.

As I noted, I think yesterday, there are a lot of costs here associated with Russias decision to take this action in violation of international law. It is certainly not in Russias long-term interests to have a destabilized Ukraine. It is not in Russias interests to find itself isolated from international opinion on these matters, and certainly not in Russias interests economically to see investors around the world think twice about whether or not Russia is the proper environment for further investment given the actions that Russia has taken and the international reaction to those actions. So we are urging Russia to work with the international community to pursue a path of deescalation and a path of dialogue with the Ukrainian government so that these matters can be resolved.


Q Jay, on the CIA, you started out by saying you cant say much because the Inspector General of the CIA is investigating this. How can we trust the CIA to investigate itself on whether it covered up something?

MR. CARNEY: Ed, you know that inspectors general are independent, correct?

Q Theyre supposed to be, by law.

MR. CARNEY: Are you doubting his independence or her independence?

Q In general, inspectors general independence has been questioned, yes. So youre confident the CIA Inspector General will get to the bottom of it?

MR. CARNEY: I think that there is an inspector general review, an IG review underway. As I mentioned, there is also a referral to the Department of Justice. And so, since these matters are generally under investigation, Im not going to get into specific allegations. I would also point you to what the Director of the CIA himself said about these matters, which is that, If there was any inappropriate actions that were taken related to that review either by CIA or by the SSCI staff -- thats the committee staff -- Id be the first to say we need to get to the bottom of it. And certainly, as a general principle, we support that view.

Q But would the White House consider an independent counsel, or youre confident the CIA can handle this?

MR. CARNEY: I think youre, as a general matter, impugning the independence of inspectors general around town.

Q Well, Im asking would you consider an independent counsel?

MR. CARNEY: I would note that you cited inspector general reports frequently in the past. But I think that this is under review.

Q You also correctly pointed out that the alleged abuses on detention that are in the report, the detention abuses happened under the Bush administration. However, a Democratic Senator, Dianne Feinstein, is alleging that Senate aides computer files were gone through by the CIA, as was suggested earlier, during the Obama administration. Is the White House Counsel involved at all in conducting a review to make sure that the administration itself knows exactly what happened?

MR. CARNEY: The Inspector General is conducting a review, and there is a referral to the Department of Justice. That is, in each -- I mean, certainly with the Inspector General thats the appropriate avenues for these things -- by which these things can be investigated and reviewed. I noted earlier the role that White House Counsel has played in discussions about the process and disputes about the process since protocols were put in place in 2009, but when it comes to an investigation -- or a review, as its called by the IG -- thats for the IG to do.

Q Last one, then. If you take a step back from this particular investigation, over the last year or so the American people have seen that the surveillance by the NSA was a lot wider than originally suggested to the American people, that reporters phone records at the AP and FOX were gone through, and that now were hearing that maybe Senate aides had their computer files gone through. Why should the American people trust some of these intelligence agencies?

MR. CARNEY: Again, Ed, when it comes to this specific set of allegations and reports that are under review, I cant comment on them, and I wont. What I can say is that we support what Director Brennan said today, which is that if theres any inappropriate actions that are discovered through the process of these reviews, we would -- we support what the Director said about getting to the bottom of it.

Q I guess what I dont understand -- is the administration not troubled -- this is not Darrell Issa making this allegation; this is Dianne Feinstein, Mark Udall, Patrick Leahy, Harry Reid all taking the Senate floor, making this allegation of the CIA. Is the President even troubled by the allegation? I mean, you have been very careful not to comment at all. I would assume that when Democratic senators -- and if he were still one, my guess is he would be on the floor raising this same eyebrow.

MR. CARNEY: Chuck, I mean, obviously the President is generally aware of the disputes that have --

Q Hes aware, but not troubled?

MR. CARNEY: Im not going to characterize his point of view on allegations that are under investigation. What I can say as a general matter is that everyone in this administration supports the perspective that Director Brennan expressed to Andrea Mitchell a couple of hours ago about the fact that if theres any inappropriate activity thats uncovered by these investigations, that he would support getting to the bottom of it. So thats certainly our view, its the administrations view.

Q But this seems to be, then, either hes not running the CIA and hes got folks that are being rogue underneath him and doing this without him, or hes been involved in this.

MR. CARNEY: Youre basing a question on a hypothetical about an outcome of an investigation.

Q Its not a hypothetical. Dianne Feinstein is the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee making this allegation.

MR. CARNEY: The allegation -- absolutely, the allegation exists and its under investigation.

Q This is not -- again, this is not Darrell Issa; this is not some partisan hit.

MR. CARNEY: Absolutely. And we work very closely with Chairman Feinstein and --

Q But protects everything else, been very supportive of most of the controversial intelligence decisions thats made by this administration. So one would think shes got a lot of credibility here if shes going to make an allegation like that.

MR. CARNEY: And what I would say is that, appropriately, these matters are under review by the authorities that are supposed to review them, and that Im not going to make an assessment about allegations that are under review or investigation.

Q How long has the President been aware of these allegations? Is it since Udall wrote the letter --

MR. CARNEY: I dont have a specific conversation involving anyone here to report except to say that there is general communication obviously between the Chairman and the White House and the Director on a range of issues, including matters involving the SSCI report.

Q But its fair to say it seems the President accepts Director Brennans answers on this more so -- it seems that Director Brennan is more credible than Dianne Feinstein here? I mean, thats what it sounds like.

MR. CARNEY: Chuck, I invite you to make judgments. Thats partly what youre paid to do. What I can tell you is thats not what I said. I said that we are not making assessments publicly about allegations that have been made. We are interested in making sure that the proper authorities review and investigate them, and if there is any inappropriate activity we would want to get to the bottom of it.

Q Is the President confident that Director Brennan has been straightforward with him about his version of events on this?

MR. CARNEY: The President has great confidence in Director Brennan, yes.

Q Hes confident on his version of events?

MR. CARNEY: Yes -- well, hes confident in Director Brennan. I havent been privy to conversations between him and the President on -- and Im not getting into specific conversations about specific subjects except to say that in general there have been communications between the White House, the Committee Chairman and the Director.

Q Just to go back -- Senator Feinstein is alleging a violation of separation of powers.

MR. CARNEY: Your colleagues are beginning to look pained, Chuck.

Q I understand that, but you have been very sort of blas and not answering. It just seems like if a U.S. senator is making an allegation -- a U.S. senator thats normally on your side -- an allegation that theres a violation of separation of powers here, thats pretty serious.

MR. CARNEY: We take everything she says very seriously, and we take this seriously. But Im not going to comment on matters that are under investigation or review by the appropriate authorities.


Q How do you expect this fallout with Russia over Ukraine to affect cooperation on Syria, for example, on cooperation on the destruction of the CW and on the peace process?

MR. CARNEY: We obviously have very important cooperation with Russia on the destruction of Syrias chemical weapons. We have important cooperation with Russia on other matters, including the issues that are subject to negotiation with the P5-plus-1 and Irans nuclear program. And we intend to continue to work with all of our partners on those issues. And I would note, with regard to the matter of Syrias chemical weapons that Russia has played a leading role in making a commitment on behalf of the Assad regime that those chemical weapons stockpiles would be gathered together, removed from the country and destroyed. And so Russia has responsibilities to the international community to fulfill those commitments.

And having said that, were obviously very clear about our views of the actions that Russia has taken in Ukraine, in particular in Crimea, and are very blunt about those views.

We are also very clear in our dealings with Russian officials that there is an avenue here to deescalate the situation and work with the international community to address the concerns that Russia has, ways that are consistent with international law, consistent with the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Q Jay --

MR. CARNEY: Go ahead.

Q No, just a different question. Can you share some information with us about Susan Rices visit to the United Arab Emirates, a meeting with the Saudis, and whether this is in preparation to the Presidents visit to Riyadh soon?

MR. CARNEY: I think we had a readout of that -- of her trip. I don't have anything more specific on it right now. I would refer you to the NSC press office.


Q The President has a pair of fundraisers tonight, and recently hes been warning of complacency among Democrats in the midterm election year. I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about why that's a worry for him, and what he plans to do -- aside from attending fundraisers -- to shake the Democrats up and make sure they're not complacent?

MR. CARNEY: Well, hell support Democrats and the committees consistent with the way he supported them in the past. I think the observation about complacency is more about statistical reality when it comes to who votes in midterm elections. And its certainly been the case that Democrats tend not to turn out in the same numbers in midterms as Republicans do.

And so the President and everyone else involved in the effort to support Democratic candidates and incumbents is making the case that its really important to turn out and exercise your right to vote, whoever you are. So that's, I think -- that explains that argument.

And hes going to do a number of things over the course of the year between now and November to support candidates and support the party.


Q Jay, could you talk to us about the numbers that are expected to come out? I know you say CMS, but theres been a constant call from reporters about the breakdown numbers of those who are enrolling. Are you really expecting I guess accurate -- as accurate stats as you can get, especially as persons who are enrolling have the option to fill out information about themselves like race, gender, and even age?

MR. CARNEY: What I can say, April, is that we are careful about making sure that the numbers we release are accurate. That explains why some of the numbers take some time to gather and vet to make sure that they're accurate. And that's particularly true when it comes to sort of numbers that are below the topline, not just total enrollments, but how they break down, how they break down by age.

So I would point you to CMS in terms of how they reach those numbers and which numbers they're confident in, in terms of the breakdowns. In terms of other demographic data, Im not really sure about that. I know that we have put out information about -- in the past about the percentage of enrollees who fall into that 18 to 34 category. But I would refer you to them in terms of what specifically they're going to release this afternoon. I think its numbers through February, or through March 1st. In terms of how they break them down, Id refer you to them.

Q I say that saying -- because, for instance, this Funny or Die video, theres a certain core group youre trying to go after with that video. Then there was a major push for African Americans. But it strikes us as odd that you make this push to get these groups to come in, and you cannot quantitatively find which group -- how many people from that group are enrolled.

MR. CARNEY: Well, I don't know that that's the case, or how long it takes to compile that data or what is available because of the way that folks fill out their information, and the way that insurance companies provide that information.

What I know is that were releasing the data that we feel is accurate on a consistent basis. Weve done that all along. And in the end, were confident that by the end of this open enrollment period on March 31st we are going to see that a substantial number of Americans enrolled and purchased health insurance, and that the mix will be sufficient to ensure that the marketplace -- and the marketplaces -- functions effectively.

Weve seen that already with numbers of young Americans hitting a percentage in terms of the overall figure for enrollment that's consistent with what we saw in Massachusetts when they were in their first open enrollment period. And were confident that come March 31st were going to see a mix that ensures the effectiveness of the marketplaces.

And every targeted effort that youre talking about is designed to make sure that's the case, and this is an across-the-board effort and its going to continue right up until the end. But were confident that were on track to get sufficient numbers and the kind of breakdown demographically that will make sure -- that will ensure that the marketplaces are effective.

Q But the number from Massachusetts for young people, it wasnt the number -- that wasnt your target when you started.


Q In other words, you had a higher target number.

MR. CARNEY: No, the so-called target was simply a fact about the percentage of people who are uninsured who are young Americans, not the percentage of young Americans you needed to make sure that the demographic pool worked actuarially. And what you saw in Massachusetts, I think the figure was roughly --

Q Twenty-five --

MR. CARNEY: -- 25 to 27 percent is where we were at the same stage in the open enrollment period.

Q On the CIA torture report, you said that the White House supports declassifying it and releasing it. Does that include over the objections of the CIA --

MR. CARNEY: No, I think Director Brennan spoke today about he is awaiting the submission of the report so that they can work to declassify it. Theres obviously -- with all kinds of reports like these that involve highly classified information, the declassification process is one that has to be engaged in by the agencies involved, in this case CIA.

Q And some have suggested that the President himself has the authority to do it. Is there any talk of him --

MR. CARNEY: Im not sure that that's the case, but I can tell you that he has made clear to the committee --

Q Presidents can declassify whatever they want, right?

MR. CARNEY: Well, that may be the case, Chuck. The President has made clear as President that he wants to see the findings declassified. Hes made that clear to the committee. Hes made that clear to the CIA. Hes made that clear to everyone. Hes made it clear to you.

Q Is there any deadline for that? Theres been a number of --

MR. CARNEY: Again, I think we are -- I think the Director is waiting for the submission of the report, so its hard to put a deadline on something that they havent gotten yet.

Q And Congress has said that the White House has some of the documents that its been asking for. Will the White House give those over to Congress?

MR. CARNEY: Again, I don't have -- Im not aware of that, but Ill look into it.

Q Jay, what should Putins takeaway be from the Presidents meeting tomorrow with the Ukrainian interim Prime Minister?

MR. CARNEY: That we strongly support Ukraine, the Ukrainian people, and the legitimacy of the new Ukrainian government.

Q Is the U.S. paying for this guy to come here? Is he coming on an Air Force plane? Who is paying for this?

MR. CARNEY: Hes the Prime Minister of Ukraine. I would refer you to the government of Ukraine. Im not aware of anything besides the fact that hes coming here to meet with the President.

Q So, theirs?

MR. CARNEY: I don't know.

Q Hes coming under their auspices?

MR. CARNEY: I havent been asked that question or even thought about it. I would refer you to the government of Ukraine.

Q Well, you would know if he were coming on a United States Air Force or State --

MR. CARNEY: Ill take the question. I havent been asked that question. I don't know that --

Q Will you take it?

MR. CARNEY: Are you saying that -- are you aware that hes doing that?

Q No, Im just asking.

MR. CARNEY: I would refer you to the government of Ukraine, but Ill also take the question.

Q President Abbas is coming next week here. He is still rejecting Israels demand for recognition as a Jewish state. Whats the White House reaction?

MR. CARNEY: We recognize that we are approaching a point where the parties will have to make decisions about how to forward, and this means grappling with incredibly difficult and complex issues that have divided them for too long.

Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas have already made courageous, difficult decisions, and that is a testament to their determination to try to resolve this issue.

It is our hope that the Prime Minister and President Abbas can reach past any remaining differences and arrive at a framework that moves the process forward towards peace. The United States will continue to encourage both parties in that effort.

Specifically to your question, we have been clear that the United States believes a lasting peace will involve two states -- Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, and the state of Palestine. We have also been clear that were not discussing the details of the negotiations. These are issues that ultimately the parties have to decide, but suffice it to say that we firmly believe that Israeli and Palestinian needs can be reconciled to produce a just and lasting peace.

Q I have a follow-up. The council of the Arab League confirms also its support to President Abbass judgment. Is it a problem for the credibility of the President in the Arab world?

MR. CARNEY: I can simply repeat what I just said, which is were not going to get into the details of the negotiations. Weve made our view very clear that a lasting peace will involve two states -- a state of Israel that is Jewish and Democratic, and a state of Palestine. In terms of the very complex and difficult issues that the two sides have to negotiate, were not going to get into the process of those negotiations.

Politico -- last one.

Q So Senator Feinstein also said that when they were in the midst of, I guess, kind of investigating the situation, they were told that -- that her committee was told by the CIA that the document removal was ordered by the White House, and that the White House responded by denying that there was ever such an order. And I know youre obviously not going to comment, as you said throughout the briefing, on ongoing investigations. But is it at all concerning that a government agency would just try to pawn off what seems like potentially illegal and perhaps unconstitutional action as something that the White House ordered them to do?

MR. CARNEY: I could diagram that sentence and all the ways that its filled with hypotheticals and subjects that are under review, but I won't. I will simply say that I cant comment on allegations that are under review.

Q But its not a hypothetical that -- Feinstein said that she --

MR. CARNEY: Right. And I said that we take her -- everything she says and her concerns very seriously.

Q What Im saying is she said that when she talked to the CIA they said the White House ordered them to take these documents off their server, and then when she talked to the White House they denied that. So thats not a hypothetical situation; thats what she said.

MR. CARNEY: Well, I dont have a specific conversation between the Chairman and the White House to confirm or relay to you. The other issues that youre talking about are allegations that are subject of a review. So I cant -- it would be inappropriate for me to talk about it.

Q Did Senator Feinstein give this White House any indication beforehand she was going to the Senate floor today to make these allegations?

MR. CARNEY: I dont know the answer to that question.

Q Can you take the question?

MR. CARNEY: I can take the question, but I dont know the answer to it.

Thanks very much.

END 1:37 P.M. EDT

Distribution channels: U.S. Politics